Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2010-1203 FCA A,[2010] FCAFC 145
Date2010
Year2010
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
41 cases
  • Coyne and Another v an Bord Pleanála and Others; Coyne and Another v an Bord Pleanála and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 July 2023
    ...IEHC 14 §217; R (Harris) v Environment Agency [2022] PTSR 1751, [2022] PTSR 1751. In Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145, the Federal Court of Australia said that “… the expression “have regard to” is capable of different meanings depending on its 28 Killeglan......
  • Shadowmill Ltd v an Bord Pleanála
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 March 2023
    ...to” in context, see for example the decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145 and of the Queen's Bench in R(Harris) v Environment Agency [2022] EWHC 2264, [2022] PTSR 474 Córas Iompair Éireann and Another v An Bord Plean......
  • Christchurch Medical Officer of Health v J & G Vaudrey Limited
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 6 November 2015
    ...601 (HC) at 612; Donnithorne v Christchurch City Council [1994] NZRMA 67 (PT) at 103. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145, (2010) 274 ALR 438 at [57], citing Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 ; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] ......
  • SZQYM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 12 June 2020
    ...427 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145; 190 FCR 248 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; 205 CLR 507 NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigra......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles