Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1996
Neutral Citation1996-0527 HCA A,[1996] HCA 6
Date1996
Year1996
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2180 cases
2 firm's commentaries
10 books & journal articles
  • Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...The extended reasoning from which this passage is taken was approved in Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, 272 (Brennan CJ, Toohey, McHugh and Gummow JJ). 12 Ibid 36. Basten has usefully noted that this and other r eferences to the separation of ......
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...J). 150 Ibid 40. Cf 30 (Gibbs CJ), 56 (Brennan J). 151 Ibid 44. 152 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shang Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, 276 (Brennan CJ, McHugh, Toohey and Gummow JJ); Aronson, Dyer and Groves, above n 18, 97–102. 153 R v Connell; Ex parte The Hetton Bellbird Co......
  • The Nature of Merits Review: A Bold Vision Realised in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-2, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24, 40–1; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, 272; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611, 646 [117] (Gummow J); SZMDS (2010) 24 0 CLR 611, 621–2 [27......
  • Tiptoeing through the Tripwires: Recent Developments in Jurisdictional Error
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 44-3, September 2016
    • 1 September 2016
    ...J). 251 Jaffarie (2014) 226 FCR 505, 539. 252 (2015) 235 FCR 386, 407. 253 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, 272. 254 SZBEL v Minister f or Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152, 166. 494 Federal Law Review Volu......
  • Get Started for Free