Mitchell v Barker
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | 1918-0315 HCA A,[1918] HCA 13 |
Date | 1918 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Ffrost v Stevenson (1937) 58 CLR 528
...27 (1860) 65 U.S. 66; 16 Law. Ed. 717 and Robertson v Baldwin 28 (1897) 165 U.S. 275; 41 Law. Ed. 715; see also Mitchell v Barker 29 (1918) 24 CLR 365. S18 of the Service and Execution of Process Act enables State magistrates, in the capacity of State magistrates, and not as officers of the......
- North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service Inc. v Bradley
-
Wurridjal v The Commonwealth of Australia
...93 Buchanan v The Commonwealth (1913) 16 CLR 315 ; [1913] HCA 29; R v Bernasconi (1915) 19 CLR 629; [1915] HCA 13; Mitchell v Barker (1918) 24 CLR 365; [1918] HCA 13; Porter v The King; Ex parte Yee (1926) 37 CLR 432; [1926] HCA 9; Federal Capital Commission v Laristan Building and Investme......
- Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Munro British Imperial Oil Company Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...on the terms which it thinks fit. 2 Buchanan v The Commonwealth (1913) 16 CLR 315; R v Bernasconi (1915) 19 CLR 629; Mitchell v Barker (1918) 24 CLR 365; Waters v The Commonwealth (1951) 82 CLR 188. 3 Porter v The King; Ex parte Yee (1926) 37 CLR 432. 4 Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132; Cap......