Momcilovic v The Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow J.,Hayne J.,Heydon J.,Crennan,Kiefel JJ.,Bell J.
Judgment Date08 September 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] HCA 34,2011-0908 HCA A
Docket NumberM134/2010
Date08 September 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
102 cases
  • Hallgath v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • BBH v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 28 March 2012
    ...had been under 16 years of age at all times between 1989 and 1999. 40Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 85 ALJR 957 at 1035 [295] per Hayne J; 280 ALR 221 at 309; [2011] HCA 34. 41 (1989) 168 CLR 266 at 284. See also at 276 per Dawson J; Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77 at 106–108 per Kirby ......
  • Lewis v Australian Capital Territory
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 16 February 2018
    ...and Indigenous Affairs v Hamdan [2005] FCAFC 113 ; 143 FCR 398 Ministry of Transport v Noort [1992] 3 NZLR 260 Momcilovic v The Queen [2011] HCA 34 ; 245 CLR 1 Monaghan v Australian Capital Territory (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 352 ; 315 FLR 305 Monk v Warby [1935] 1 KB 75 Montero v Travis, Comm......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 12 June 2019
    ...HCA 41; Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252 at 264–265 [31]; [2010] HCA 23; Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1 at 133–134 [315]; [2011] HCA 34; Certain Lloyd's Underwriters v Cross (2012) 248 CLR 378 at 389–390 [25]; [2012] HCA 56; Kline v Official Secre......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
34 books & journal articles
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...Act — Three Questions’ (2005) 27 Australian Bar Review 25, 31–5. 70 Solomons v District Court (NSW) (2002) 211 CLR 119, 135. 71 (2011) 245 CLR 1. 370 Federal Law Review Volume 42 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Act 2006 and the ACT Human......
  • Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? the Limitations Imposed by Sections 51 and 52 of the Australian Consitution
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 44-2, June 2016
    • 1 June 2016
    ...[56]; Plaintiff M79/2012 v Minister for Immigration and Citizensh ip (2013) 252 CLR 336, 367 [88] (Hayne J); Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1, 159–160 [400] and accompanying note (Heydon J). See also arguments put in Williams v Commonwealth [No 2] (2014) 252 CLR 416, 418–9. 10 Some o......
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review Nbr. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...be so “in spite of the industrial aspect which the provision undeniably presents”.130123 Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1, [244]; [2011] HCA 34; The Commonwealth v The Australian Capital Territory (2013) 250 CLR 441, [59]; [2013] HCA 55. 124 Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 C......
  • Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...v Totani (2010) 242 CLR 1; Hogan v Hinch (2011) 243 CLR 506; Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181; Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1. 98 International Finance Trust Co Ltd v NSW Crime Commission, (2009) 2 40 CLR 319; South Australia v Totani (2010) 242 CLR 1; Wainohu v New Sou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT