Momcilovic v The Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow J.,Hayne J.,Heydon J.,Crennan,Kiefel JJ.,Bell J.
Judgment Date08 September 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] HCA 34,2011-0908 HCA A
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberM134/2010
Date08 September 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
119 cases
  • Hallgath v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Attorney-General v Arthur William Taylor
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 November 2018
    ...(1975) 1 EHRR 524 (ECHR) at 541. 75 Temese v Police (1992) 9 CRNZ 425 (CA) at 427. 76 Taylor (CA), above n 4, at [161]. 77 Momcilovic v R [2011] HCA 34, (2011) 245 CLR 78 A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56, [2005] 2 AC 68. 79 Above n 30. 80 Convention for the Pr......
  • Monis v The Queen; Droudis v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 27 February 2013
    ...J; [1992] HCA 46; Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106 at 216–217 per Gaudron J. 157 See Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1 at 84 [146(iii)], 87–90 [148]–[160] per Gummow J; [2011] HCA 34. 158 Lange (1997) 189 CLR 520. 159Levy v Victoria (1997) 1......
  • Attorney-General (Cth) v Huynh
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 May 2023
    ...also The Commonwealth v Mewett (1997) 191 CLR 471 at 493. 289 Le Mesurier v Connor (1929) 42 CLR 481 at 496. 290 Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1 at 69 [100] (emphasis in original), quoting Cowen and Zines's Federal Jurisdiction in Australia, 3rd ed (2002) at 90. See also Cowen and Z......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
41 books & journal articles
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...be so “in spite of the industrial aspect which the provision undeniably presents”.130123 Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1, [244]; [2011] HCA 34; The Commonwealth v The Australian Capital Territory (2013) 250 CLR 441, [59]; [2013] HCA 55. 124 Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 C......
  • Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? the Limitations Imposed by Sections 51 and 52 of the Australian Consitution
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 44-2, June 2016
    • 1 June 2016
    ...[56]; Plaintiff M79/2012 v Minister for Immigration and Citizensh ip (2013) 252 CLR 336, 367 [88] (Hayne J); Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1, 159–160 [400] and accompanying note (Heydon J). See also arguments put in Williams v Commonwealth [No 2] (2014) 252 CLR 416, 418–9. 10 Some o......
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...Act — Three Questions’ (2005) 27 Australian Bar Review 25, 31–5. 70 Solomons v District Court (NSW) (2002) 211 CLR 119, 135. 71 (2011) 245 CLR 1. 370 Federal Law Review Volume 42 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Act 2006 and the ACT Human......
  • Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...v Totani (2010) 242 CLR 1; Hogan v Hinch (2011) 243 CLR 506; Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181; Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1. 98 International Finance Trust Co Ltd v NSW Crime Commission, (2009) 2 40 CLR 319; South Australia v Totani (2010) 242 CLR 1; Wainohu v New Sou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT