Morgan v White
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1912] HCA 50,1912-0812 HCA A |
| Date | 1912 |
| Year | 1912 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
- Brannigan v Commonwealth
-
BHP Group Ltd v Impiombato
...v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1945) 71 CLR 309 at 345. 21 cf Morrison v National Australia Bank Ltd (2010) 561 US 247 at 255. 22 (1912) 15 CLR 1 at 23 (1912) 15 CLR 1 at 4-5. 24 See the references in Morgan v White (1912) 15 CLR 1 at 4-5 and 13 to Macleod v Attorney-General for New ......
-
Meyer Heine Pty v China Navigation Company
...are presumed to be limited to those in the territory over which it has jurisdiction’ (per Isaacs, J., in Morgan v. WhiteUNKUNK (1912), 15 C.L.R. 1, at p. 13; 18 A.L.R. 413) and it ‘is always to be understood and implied that the legislature of a country is not intending to deal with persons......
-
Tax Practitioners Board v Buckland (Interim Injunction)
...intend to give its enactment an effect which would be inconsistent with international law or with the comity of nations” (Morgan v White (1912) 15 CLR 1 at 5 (per Barton J)) and there is thus a presumption that Acts are restricted in their operation within territorial limits (Jumbunna Coal ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
New Forms of Damage in Negligence
...not a denial of the existence of damage. In the leading Australian case on wrongful con-ception, Cattanach vMelchior [2003] HCA 38, (2003) 215 CLR 1, there was no appeal from theaward of damages to the mother for the pregnancy and birth (see at [14] per Gleeson CJ), andvon Bar states that‘n......