Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | 2002-1011 FCA C,2003-0513 FCA A |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Tran v Commonwealth
-
Hogan v Hinch
...rather than ‘incidental’ burden upon that communication. The distinction was explained as follows by Gleeson CJ in Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission135. After pointing out that there are many laws (and s 42 of the Act is one such law) which affect freedom to communicate, his Hono......
-
Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission
...1983. 2 Australia, Senate, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 11 October 2000 at 18253. 3Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission (2002) 193 ALR 710. 4Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission (2003) 128 FCR 523. 5Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520. 6 (1997)......
- O’Flaherty v City of Sydney Council
2 books & journal articles
-
The Constitutional (In)Validity of Religious Vilification Laws: Implications for their Interpretation
...(1997) 189 CLR 579, 596–8 (Brennan CJ) ('Levy'); Coleman (2004) 220 CLR 1, 52 (McHugh J); Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission (2003) 128 FCR 523, 533–4 (Black CJ, Weinberg and Selway JJ). Cf ACTV (1992) 177 CLR 106, 217–8 (Gaudron J); Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR ......
-
Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
...J); Mulholland (2004) 220 CLR 181, 251–2 [203], 266 [248] (Kirby J). Cf discussion in Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission (2003) 128 FCR 523, 534 [31] (Black CJ, Weinberg and Selway JJ). 165 (2004) 220 CLR 1, 82 [212]. 166 Obviously the same could not be said if the word 'reasonabl......