Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,McHugh,Gummow,Kirby,Hayne,Callinan,Heydon JJ
Judgment Date05 February 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] HCA 3,2004-0205 HCA A
Docket NumberS78/2003
Date05 February 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
103 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Interpreting Loss or Damage Under the Trade Practices Act
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 September 2004
    ...beginning with an attempt to draw an analogy with any particular claim under the general law. In Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Limited [2004] HCA 3 (5 February 2004) the High Court of Australia overturned the Federal Court's decision in respect of how "loss or damage" should be......
4 books & journal articles
  • CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal Nbr. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Meaning of Legislation: Context, Purpose and Respect for Fundamental Rights”(2009) 20 PLR 26. 40Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd(2004) 216 CLR 388 at 407, [44]. See also Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd(1998) 196 CLR 494 at 503–504, [17], per Gaudron J, 510, [38], per McHugh, Hayne an......
  • The role of damages in regulating horizontal price-fixing: comparing the situation in the United States, Europe and Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 30 Nbr. 3, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...obligation to mitigate its losses, although it is not clear how this operates in practice: see Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 388, 413-15 (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ). See also Hubbards Pty Ltd v Simpson Ltd (1982) 41 ALR 509, a cas......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review Nbr. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...suit against lawyers); Glenbrook Capital LP v Hamilton [2014] EWHC 2297 (Comm) at [42]–[44]; and Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 3 at [74]. 26 [2018] SGDC 188. 27 See, eg, Given v C V Holland (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1977) 15 ALR 439 (FCA); Hollis v PH and D Stephens Investments ......
  • It's Time for Federal Regulation of Retirement Villages
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 45-3, September 2017
    • 1 September 2017
    ...to misleading or deceptive conduct with reference to financial services. 56 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), sch 2 cl 18. 57 (2004) 216 CLR 388; earlier proceedings in Murphy and 112 Ors v Overton Investments Pty Limited [1998] NSWSC 425 noted by Betty Weule, ‘Retirement Village Tor......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT