Naav v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2002
Neutral Citation[2002] FCAFC 228
Year2002
Date2002
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 books & journal articles
  • Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 Diciembre 2002
    ...Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 189 ALR 293,297. (34) NAAV v Minister Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 (Unreported, Black C J, Beaumont, Wilcox, French and von Doussa JJ, 15 August 2002); NAAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Aff......
  • Judicial Review of Migration Decisions: Life after S157
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 Marzo 2005
    ...Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union, Australian Section (1951) 82 CLR 208. 10 S157 (2003) 211 CLR 476, 504 [69]. 11 Ibid. 12 (2002) 123 FCR 298 ('NAAV'). 13 There were some members of the Federal Court who considered NAAV (2002) 123 FCR 298 should be adhered to. See Lobo v Minister for I......
  • Truth, Justice and the Australian Way— Plaintiff S157 OF 2002 V Commonwealth
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-2, June 2003
    • 1 Junio 2003
    ...Honours did not need to consider other arguments regarding the RRT'sdecision or the Minister's decision. See ibid 50–1 [97]–[100].99 (2002) 193 ALR 449 ('NAAV').100 The only reference is to be found in the judgment of Gleeson CJ at 35 [36] and this commentdoes not deal with the substa nce o......
  • Privative clauses: epic fail.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 3, December 2010
    • 1 Diciembre 2010
    ...(Deane, Gaudron and McHugh JJ), 303-9 (Dawson J). (20) See NAA V v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 123 FCR 298, 311-12 [20]-[21] (Black CJ), 340 [105] (Beaumont J), 381 [308] (Wilcox J), 448-50 [538]-[546] (French J), 480-2 [640]-[646] (von Doussa (2......
  • Get Started for Free