National Australia Bank Limited v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
JudgeALLSOP CJ
Judgment Date20 September 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 1543
Date20 September 2019
National Australia Bank Limited v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1543

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


National Australia Bank Limited v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1543


File number:

VID 527 of 2019



Judge:

ALLSOP CJ



Date of judgment:

20 September 2019



Catchwords:

COURTS AND JUDGES – jurisdiction – where applicant initiated proceeding in Insurance List seeking declaratory relief in relation to the proper construction of policies of insurance and reinsurance – where respondents filed interlocutory applications seeking orders that the originating application be set aside pursuant to r 13.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), or that the proceeding be dismissed pursuant to s 31A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), or an order for summary judgment pursuant to r 26.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear the underlying construction proceeding – whether there exists a matter arising under a law of the Parliament – whether the underlying construction proceeding is in respect of a matter arising under a law of the Parliament – whether declaratory relief inappropriate due to hypotheticality and/or inutility – interlocutory applications dismissed with costs



Legislation:

Australian Constitution, ss 75, 76

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 19, 21, 22, 23, 31A

Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), ss 54, 57

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1A)

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 63, 75



Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 9.21, 13.01, 16.21, 26.01



Cases cited:

Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10; 175 CLR 564

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 1; 204 CLR 559

Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [1999] HCA 9; 198 CLR 334

Bateman’s Bay Local Aboriginal Land Council v The Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund Pty Ltd [1998] HCA 49; 194 CLR 247

Cacciola v Fire & All Risks Insurance Co Ltd [1971] 1 NSWLR 691

Champerslife Pty Ltd v Manojlovski [2010] NSWCA 33; 75 NSWLR 245

Coles v Wood [1981] 1 NSWLR 723

Commonwealth v BIS Cleanaway Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1075; 214 FLR 271

Commonwealth v BIS Cleanaway Ltd [2008] NSWCA 170

Croome v Tasmania [1997] HCA 5; 191 CLR 119

Crouch v Commissioner for Railways (Qld) [1985] HCA 69; 159 CLR 22

Danthanarayana v Commonwealth [2016] FCAFC 114

Delor Vue Apartments CTS 39788 v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2019] FCA 639

Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners [1949] HCA 1; 78 CLR 62

Edwards v Santos Ltd [2011] HCA 8; 242 CLR 421

Federated Engine-Drivers and Firemen’s Association of Australasia v The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Ltd [1911] HCA 31; 12 CLR 398

Felton v Mulligan [1971] HCA 39; 124 CLR 367

Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12; 152 CLR 570

Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61; 127 CLR 421

FQM Australia Nickel Pty Ltd v Bullen [2011] FCAFC 30; 191 FCR 261

General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; 112 CLR 125

Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; 67 ER 313

Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1584; 96 FCR 1

In re Judiciary and Navigation Acts [1921] HCA 20; 29 CLR 257

In re Pacific Railway Commission 32 F 241 (1887)

Integrated Lighting & Ceilings Pty Ltd v Phillips Electrical Pty Ltd (1969) 90 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 693

Jager v Tolme & Runge and the London Produce Clearing House, Ltd [1916] 1 KB 939

Lewis v Green [1905] 2 Ch 340

Lohar Corporation Pty Ltd v Dibu Pty Ltd (1976) 1 BPR 97014

Moorgate Tobacco Co Ltd v Philip Morris Ltd [1980] HCA 32; 145 CLR 457

Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips [1974] HCA 18; 131 CLR 286

NRMA Insurance Ltd v Tatt (1989) 94 FLR 339

Palmer v Ayres [2017] HCA 5; 259 CLR 478

Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 7; 148 CLR 457

Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; 147 CLR 589

QBE Insurance Ltd v Nguyen [2008] SASC 138; 100 SASR 560

Quest Rose Hill Pty Ltd v White [2010] NSWSC 939

R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett [1945] HCA 50; 70 CLR 141

Rajbenback v Mamon [1955] 1 QB 283

Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC 156; 254 FCR 1

Re Bowman [1994] 1 Qd R 251

Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference [2002] HCA 16; 209 CLR 372

Re Multiplex Constructions [1999] 1 Qd R 287

Re Security Projects Ltd; Re K Mart (Aust) Ltd & Roggette [1993] QSC 18

Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally [1999] HCA 27; 198 CLR 511

Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd [1921] 2 AC 438

Schering Ltd v Stockholms Enskilda Bank Aktiebolag [1946] AC 219

Sop & Sop Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 102

South Australia v Victoria [1911] HCA 17; 12 CLR 667

Spencer v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28; 241 CLR 118

Trans Realties Pty Ltd v Grbac [1975] 1 NSWLR 170

Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd [2000] HCA 11; 200 CLR 591

Union of India v Compania Naviera Aeolus SA [1962] 1 QB 1

United Broadcasting International Pty Ltd v Turkplus Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1413

Unity Insurance Brokers Pty Ltd v Rocco Pezzano Pty Ltd [1998] HCA 38; 192 CLR 603

Wighams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Smith [1975] 1 NSWLR 76

Winchcombe Carson Trustee Co Ltd v Ball-Rand Pty Ltd [1974] 1 NSWLR 477



Date of hearing:

21 August 2019



Date of last submissions:

23 August 2019



Registry:

New South Wales



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and InsuranceInsurance List



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

175



Counsel for the Applicant:

Ms W A Harris QC with Ms S Gory



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Herbert Smith Freehills



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Ms V Whittaker SC with Mr R Pietriche



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

King & Wood Mallesons



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr M Darke SC with Ms C van Proctor



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Kennedys



Counsel for the Third and Fourth Respondents:

Mr G Rich SC with Mr G Ng and Mr R Jedrzejczyk



Solicitor for the Third and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 cases
  • Minister for the Environment v Sharma
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 15 March 2022
    ...Life & Citizens’ Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt [1968] HCA 74; 122 CLR 556 National Australia Bank Ltd v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1543; 377 ALR 627 Naxakis v Western General Hospital [1999] HCA 22; 197 CLR 269 Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The W......
  • McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 11 December 2020
    ...MZXOT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] HCA 28; 233 CLR 601 National Australia Bank v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1543; 377 ALR 627 National Union of Workers v Davids Distribution Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1109; 165 ALR 595 Nolan v Minister for Immigration and Ethn......
  • Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited (Liability Judgment)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 8 March 2023
    ...Ltd v Securities Commission [1995] AC 500; [1995] All ER 918 National Australia Bank Limited v Nautilus Insurance Pte Limited (No. 2) (2019) 377 ALR 627 Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd (1997) 191 CLR 85 O'Donnell v Reichard [1975] VR 916 Oil Basins Limited v The Commonwealth (1993)......
  • Tucker v McKee
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 3 June 2022
    ...Moorgate Tobacco Co Ltd v Philip Morris Ltd [1980] HCA 32; 145 CLR 457 National Australia Bank Ltd v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1543; 377 ALR 627 Northern Territory v GPAO [1999] HCA 8; 196 CLR 553 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte [1938] HCA 7; 59 CLR 369 R v Common......
  • Get Started for Free