National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1959] HCA 67,1959-1216 HCA A
Date1959
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
69 cases
40 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 Enero 2018
    ...Ltd v Victoria23of earlier apparent approval 12 National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (1959) 102 CLR 252; [1959] HCA 67. 13 (2015) 258 CLR 334; [2015] HCA 35. 14 (1941) 66 CLR 237, 283-4; [1941] HCA 22. 15 (1933) 55 CLR 182; [1933] HCA 1. 16 (1936) 55 CLR 193; ......
  • On the legality of gene patents.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 29 No. 3, December 2005
    • 1 Diciembre 2005
    ...See, eg, Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 18(1) and the definition of invention in sch 1. (52) See, eg, ALRC, above n 5, [6.20]-[6.30]. (53) (1959) 102 CLR 252 (54) Ibid 253 (Dixon CJ, Kitto and Windeyer JJ). (55) Patents Act, 35 USC [section] 101 (1952). (56) 447 US 303,309 (1980) ('Chakrabarty').......
  • RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COPYRIGHT AND PATENT PROTECTION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 Diciembre 1994
    ...Court decisions in Gottschalk v Benson409 US 63 (1972), Parker v Flook437 US 584 (1978), and Diamond v Diehr, supra, note 125. 137 (1959) 102 CLR 252. 138 (1993) 15 EIPR D-29. 139 For instance, another fairly recent case dealing with the patentability of a computer program related invention......
  • Are plant breeder's rights outdated? A descriptive and empirical assessment of plant breeder's rights in Australia, 1987-2007.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 32 No. 3, December 2008
    • 1 Diciembre 2008
    ...plant varieties were patentable by referring to the decision of National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (1959) 102 CLR 252 and the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents in relation to Rank Hovis McDougall Ltd's application to the Australian Patents Of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT