Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents

Cited in 5 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Date1961
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Commissioner of Patents v Rokt Pte Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 21 mai 2020
    ...1; 75 ALJR 518; 177 ALR 460; 50 IPR 513 National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67; 102 CLR 252; [1960] ALR 114; [1961] RPC 134 Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150; 227 FCR 378; 109 IPR 364 Rokt Pte Ltd [2016] APO 66 Rokt......
  • Fisons Ltd, Petition of
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 janvier 1984
    ......& THE PATENTS ACT IN THE MATTER OF THE ... a proportion of costs to the Patentee of research and development wheresoever incurred.". ......
  • Tennessee Eastman Co. et al. v. Commissioner of Patents, [1974] SCR 111
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 22 décembre 1972
    ...102, [1967] 1 Ex. C.R. 57. [4] [1959] S.C.R. 219, 30 C.P.R. 59, 17 D.L.R. (2d) 153. [5] [1962] R.P.C. 37. [6] [1961]R.P.C. 147. [7] [1961] R.P.C. 134. [8] [1955] S.C.R. 414, 15 Fox Pat. C. 99, 23 C.P.R. [9] [1971] R.P.C. 337. [10] (1954), 103 U.S. P.Q. 107. [11] (1862), 5 Blatchford 116.
2 firm's commentaries
  • Isolated genetic material: invention or land grab? The D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics case
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 janvier 2015
    ...14 This type of product was held in the leading case of National Research Development Corp v Cmr of Patents (1959) 102 CLR 252; [1960] ALR 114; [1961] RPC 134; BC5900480 to be included in the definition of "method of manufacture". 15Above, n 10, at [12]. 16 Above, n 10, at [143]. 17 Above, ......
  • Patentability of genetic material - where does it stand today?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 septembre 2013
    ...6Patents Act 1990 (Cth), s 18(1)(a). 7National Research Development Corp v Cmr BRCA1: Serial of Patents (NRDC case) (1959) 102 CLR 252; [1960] ALR 114; [1961] RPC 134; 8Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics (2013) 569 US 12-398. 9Above, n 1. 10US Patent Act, 35 USC §101. 11L......
1 books & journal articles
  • INVENTIONS, GENES AND NAPOLEONIC VICTORIES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 décembre 1997
    ...it enables the courts in Australia to refer to the policy behind the Statute of Monopolies in deciding the ambit of the expression. 25 [1960] ALR 114. Sec also NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Ltd.(1995) AIPC 91—196. 26 See Lane-Fox v Kensington and Knightsbridge El......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT