Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeMcHugh ACJ,Gummow,Hayne JJ,Kirby J.,Callinan J.
Judgment Date11 March 2004
Neutral Citation2004-0311 HCA A,[2004] HCA 14
Docket NumberS150/2003
CourtHigh Court
Date11 March 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
106 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF FAIR DEALING
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...57 J Copyright Soc'y USA 611 at 617 (suggesting that there is no clear ruling in the leading case of TCN Channel Nine v Network Ten(2004) 218 CLR 273 because of the significant disagreement between the judges on whether the dealing was fair and whether it fell within a permitted purpose); N......
  • List of cases
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • January 1, 2011
    ...The (1842) 166 ER 81 633Neptune, The (1835) 166 ER 354Nestor, The 18 F Cas 9 (1831)Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2004) 205 ALR 1New Orleans Terminal Co v Hanson 188 F 638 (1911)New York Trust Co v Eisner 256 US 345 (1921)Nicaraguan Barque Courier, The (1879) 13 SALR 124Nie......
  • The maritime lien and the present Australian admiralty law
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • January 1, 2011
    ...Appointed) v The Owners of the Ship MV Steven C [1994] 1 Qld R 69 (The Steven C).26 Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2004) 205 ALR 1 at [11]; Tisand Pty Ltd v Owners of the Ship MV “Cape Moreton” (Ex “Freya”) (2005) 143 FCR 43 at [59] (The Cape 279Commission said in its repor......
  • Outside the Text: Inside the use of Extrinsic Materials in Statutory Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • June 1, 2014
    ...identify the ‘mischief’ of the relevant statutory provision or Act.61 53 Ibid. 54 Examples are Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Chan nel Nine (2004) 218 CLR 273, 280 [11] (McHugh ACJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ); Attorn ey General v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162, 175 [28] (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT