New South Wales v Commonwealth Commonwealth v New South Wales

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1915] HCA 17,1915-0323 HCA A
Date1915
Year1915
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
32 cases
  • James v Cowan
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Macks; ex parte Saint;Re Macks; ex parte Johnson
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 Diciembre 2000
    ...v Barger (1908) 6 CLR 41 at 118. Isaacs J spoke to the same effect in The State of New South Wales v The Commonwealth (‘the WheatCase’) (1915) 20 CLR 54 at 98–99. Higgins J (with Isaacs J) dissented in Barger, but his Honour's judgment has been vindicated by time: see Zines, The High Court ......
  • Williams v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 20 Junio 2012
    ...101 of the Constitution, which provides for the establishment and functions of the Inter-State Commission, is striking 102. In New South Wales v The Commonwealth (‘the Inter-State Commission case’) 103, which was concerned with s 101, Isaacs J, with whom Powers J agreed 104, described s 61 ......
  • Mann v Carnell
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
24 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 Agosto 2012
    ...laws are predominantly judicial': at 714 n 239. The fact that it was not is significant. (316) New South Wales v Commonwealth (1915) 20 CLR 54, 88 (Isaacs J). See also A-G (Cth) v The Queen (1957) 95 CLR 529, 540 (Viscount Simonds for Viscounts Simonds and Kilmuir LC, Lords Morton, Tucker, ......
  • Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 2, August 2010
    • 1 Agosto 2010
    ...Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84, 134-5, 139-40 (Toohey J). See also at 159 (McHugh J). (182) See New South Wales v Commonwealth (1915) 20 CLR 54, 93 (Isaacs J); Grollo v Palmer (1995) 184 CLR 348, 376-7 (McHugh J), 392-4 (Gummow J); Kruger v Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1, 167 (Gummow J)......
  • Termination of Appointments to Public Offices
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 24-1, March 1996
    • 1 Marzo 1996
    ...issueinthe casewaswhether,inthecircumstances,theplaintiffshadarightto afair hearing.217218219220221After New SouthWalesvCommonwealth (1915) 20 CLR 54,noappointmentsweremadetotheInter-State Commission(pursuantto s103oftheCommonwealthofAustraliaConstitution) to fill vacancieswhicharosewhenthe......
  • Due Process, Judicial Power and Chapter III in the New High Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-2, June 2004
    • 1 Junio 2004
    ...22 Ibid 26. 23 (2000) 205 CLR 337 ('Ebner'). 24 New South Wales v Commonwealth ('Wheat Case') (1915) 20 CLR 54 and Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia v J W Alexander Ltd (1918) 25 CLR 434. In relation to the 'first' and 'second' 'limbs' of the separation doctrine, see Cheryl Saunder......
  • Get Started for Free