Nicholas v The Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1998
Neutral Citation[1998] HCA 9,1998-0202 HCA C
Date1998
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
127 cases
23 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 août 2012
    ...Employees & Builders' Labourers' Federation (1974) 130 CLR 87, 90 (Barwick CJ), 102 (Mason J). See also Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173, 220-1 [112] (McHugh (256) Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, 357 (Griffith CJ); Rola Co (Australia) Pty Ltd v Comm......
  • Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 2, August 2010
    • 1 août 2010
    ...generally Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 ('Lim'); Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173. Many of the features of the IAA discussed in this article would also be relevant to the issue of whether s 8 interferes with judicial po......
  • Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 décembre 2002
    ...J). (81) Richard Walter (1995) 183 CLR 168, 184. (82) Ibid. Note a clearer line can be drawn on the facts in Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173, 188 (Brennan C (83) Chu Kheng Lira v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1, 27 (Brennan, Deane and D......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 mars 2012
    ...Laurance v Katter [2000] 1 Qd R 147 (in which Parliamentary Privileges Act 19 87 (Cth) s 16(3) was challenged); Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173 (in which Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 15X was challenged); Re Australasian Memory Pty Ltd (1997) 149 ALR 393 (in which the Attorney–General int......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT