Nicholls v the Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,McHugh J,Gummow,Callinan JJ,Kirby J,Hayne,Heydon JJ
Judgment Date03 February 2005
Neutral Citation2005-0203 HCA B,[2005] HCA 1
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberP79/2003
Date03 February 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • R. v. Douglas (R.D.), (2005) 387 A.R. 1 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 28 February 2005
    ...Kelly v. R., [2004] HCA 12; 78 A.L.J.R. 538; 205 A.L.R. 274 (Aust. H.C.), refd to. [para. 169, footnote 44]. Nicholls v. R.; Coates v. R., [2005] HCA 1 (Aust. H.C.), refd to. [para. 169, footnote R. v. Araujo (A.) et al., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 992; 262 N.R. 346; 143 B.C.A.C. 257; 235 W.A.C. 257; ......
  • Gedeon v Commissioner of NSW Crime Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 4 September 2008
    ...[24]; 231 ALR 500 at 506; [2006] HCA 58; Tully v The Queen (2006) 230 CLR 234 at 256–257 [75]–[76]; [2006] HCA 56; Nicholls v The Queen (2005) 219 CLR 196 at 321–322 [372]; [2005] HCA 1; Doggett v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 343 at 373 [115]; [2001] HCA 46; KRM v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 221 a......
  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 28 September 2006
    ...In Character, (1984) at 82. 441 R v Schaeffer (2005) 159 A Crim R 101 at 105 [12] per Ormiston JA. 442 See Nicholls v The Queen (2005) 219 CLR 196. ...
  • Baker v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 August 2012
    ...Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 9 per Brennan CJ. 16Slatterie v Pooley (1840) 6 M & W 664 at 669 [ 151 ER 579 at 581] per Parke B cited in Nicholls v The Queen (2005) 219 CLR 196 at 266 [184] per Gummow and Callinan JJ; [2005] HCA 17Bannon v The Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 27 per Dawson, Toohey a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...689 New Brunswick (Minister of Social Development) v NS, 2013 NBCA 8 ........... 259 Nicholls v The Queen, [2005] HCA 1 ................................................................ 605 Nickmar Pty Ltd v Preservatrice Skandia Insurance Ltd (1985), 3 NSWLR 44 (SC) ..............................
  • Evidence About Credibility and Reliability
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...para 12. For a more thorough review of the collateral fact rule and the bias, interest, corruption exception, see Nicholls v The Queen , [2005] HCA 1 at paras 61–73, McHugh J. THE L AW OF EVIDENCE 606 is often called, 64 including evidence that a witness with outstanding charges intends to ......
  • Admissibility of confession evidence: Principles of hearsay and the rule of voluntariness
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 25-2, April 2021
    • 1 April 2021
    ...155 CriminalInvestigation Act 2006 (WA); see also Carr vThe State of Western Australia (2007) 232 CLR 138; Nicholls & Coates vTheQueen (2005) 219 CLR 196; Wright, n. 4 above at [185] (Blaxell J).6. Section 155(2) Criminal Investigation Act 2006 (WA).7. Section 155(4) Criminal Investigation ......
  • The collateral evidence rule
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 19-2, April 2015
    • 1 April 2015
    ...... avoiding miscarriages of justice is more importantthan protecting the efficiency of trials’); and Gummow and Callinan JJ in Nicholls vR[2005] HCA 1 at [168] (‘Strictapplication of the collateral evidence rule can lead to injustice’).74. Per Scrutton LJ in Hobbs vTinling, above n. 3 at 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT