Nile v Wood

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1987-1216 HCA B,[1988] HCA 30,1988-0615 HCA A
Year1987
Date1987
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Wiest v DPP
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Hewitt v Rivers
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 9 Agosto 2013
    ...[2004] 3 W.L.R. 812; [2004] UKPC 33, referred to. (21) Maude v. LowlevELR(1874), L.R. 9 C.P. 165, referred to. (22) Nile v. WoodUNK(1988), 167 CLR 133; 62 ALJR 381; 78 ALR 684; [1988] HCA 30, distinguished. (23) Oppenheimer v. Cattermole (Inspector of Taxes), [1976] A.C. 249; [1975] 2 W.L.R......
  • Hansen v Australian Electoral Commission
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Wiltshire v Turnbull
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Allegiance, Foreign Citizenship and the Constitutional Right to Stand for Parliament
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 48-3, September 2020
    • 1 Septiembre 2020
    ...the High Court’ (2018) 29(1) Public Law Review 17.9. (1992) 176 CLR 77 (‘Sykes’). Section 44(i) has also been discussed in Nile v Wood (1987) 167 CLR 133; Sue v Hill(1999) 199 CLR 462; Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391; Singh v Commonwealth (2004) 222 CLR322.10. It also consi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT