Nominal Defendant v Hook

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1962-0920 HCA C,[1962] HCA 50
Year1962
Date1962
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Commonwealth of Australia v Helicopter Resources Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 24 April 2020
    ...Western Railway Co v Willis (1865) 18 CB (NS) 748 [ 144 ER 639] and Kirkstall Brewery Co v Furness Railway Co (1874) LR 9 QB 468. 52 (1962) 113 CLR 641 at 53 Cross, Evidence (1958) at 434-435, referring to Johnson v Lindsay (1889) 53 JP 599 and Burr v Ware Rural District Counsel [1939] 2 ......
  • Keramianakis v Regional Publishers Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 29 April 2009
    ...Court of Appeal (NSW) (1999) 198 CLR 435 at 451 [50] per Gaudron, Gummow and Callinan JJ; [1999] HCA 19. 31 (1962) 113 CLR 641 at 656; [1962] HCA 50. 32 (1905) 3 CLR 132; [1905] HCA 33 (1905) 3 CLR 132 at 147. 34 (1905) 3 CLR 132 at 149. 35 (1936) 56 CLR 50 at 53–54; [1936] HCA 28. 36Micke......
  • Gannon v Gannon
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Dowsett Engineering (New Guinea) Pty Ltd v Edwards and RE Jordan trading as Jordan Lighting [1979] PNGLR 426
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 September 1979
    ...in my opinion, be regarded as an admission against his principal. Holloway v McFeeters (1956) 94 CLR 470 and Nominal Defendant v Hook (1962) 113 CLR 641. So far as the other ground of appeal is concerned I have the misfortune to disagree with my brother Greville–Smith J in his conclusion th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT