Norcast S.A.R.L v Bradken Ltd and Others (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2013-0319 FCA E |
| Date | 2013 |
| Year | 2013 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd
...L Grollo & Co Pty Ltd v Nu-Statt Decorating Pty Ltd [1978] FCA 33; (1978) 34 FLR 81 Norcast S.ár.L v Bradken (No 2) (2013) 219 FCR 14; [2013] FCA 235 Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Victoria (2016) 328 ALR 375; [2016] HCA 4 Top Performance Motors Pty Ltd v Ira Berk (Qld) Pty Ltd (1975) 24 FLR 286 Tr......
-
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited (No 1 - Indictment)
...CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Lodhi v The Queen (2006) 199 FLR 303; [2006] NSWCCA 121 Norcast S.ár.L v Bradken Limited (No 2) (2013) 219 FCR 14; [2013] FCA 235 R v Janceski (2005) 64 NSWLR 10; [2005] NSWCCA 281 R v Tannous (1987) 10 NSWLR 303 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 Smith v Moody [1903] 1 ......
- Bradken Ltd and Others v Norcast S.ar.L
- Norcast S.ßr.L v Bradken Ltd (No 3)
6 firm's commentaries
-
Its question time on alleged cartel conduct - Obeid family members must attend examinations after the ACCCs section 155 notices are upheld
...deliberations at first instance and on appeal, please see an article reporting on the case located here. Footnotes 1 [2014] FCAFC 155 2 [2013] FCA 235. This decision was the subject of an appeal to the Full Federal Court; see Bradken Limited v Norcast S.ar.L (2013) 219 FCR 101. The appeal p......
-
Its worse because its secret: Bid-rigging, why it matters, and what it tells us about the essence of competition law
..."OFT issues Statement of Objections to certain access control and alarm systems companies", July 5, 2013. 5Norcast v Bradken (no 2) [2013] FCA 235. 6European Commission decision, Case COMP/39406 Marine Hoses, January 28, 2009, paragraph 277. 7Bellamy & Child, European Union Law of Compe......
-
Dont be caught out in your M&A negotiations by bid rigging or misleading conduct
...in this area of the law with significant consequences for M&A participants. Footnotes 1Norcast S.ár.L v Bradken Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 235 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
-
Competition in the market for corporate control
...Company and RJ. Reynolds Industries v Commission [1987] ECR 4487, paragraph 56. 51Federal Court of Australia, Norcast v Bradken (no 2) [2013] FCA 235 - concerned bid rigging or collusive tendering, which is the practice under which, when there is a competitive tender, the competing bidders ......
Request a trial to view additional results