NSW Trains v Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date03 August 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 883
CourtFederal Court
Date03 August 2021
NSW Trains v Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union [2021] FCA 883

Federal Court of Australia


NSW Trains v Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union [2021] FCA 883

File number:

NSD 427 of 2021



Judgment of:

FLICK J



Date of judgment:

3 August 2021



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – enterprise agreement – continued operation after nominal expiry date – whether clause with operation “during the life of the agreement” refers to the nominal expiry date – or whether that clause continues to operate after nominal expiry


INDUSTRIAL LAW – power of employer to give instructions – the making of extra claims


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – attempt to re-litigate dispute resolved by Fair Work Commission – whether abuse of process


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – declaratory relief – resolution of hypothetical questions – declaratory relief hypothetical both by reason of uncertainty as to regulatory framework and factual uncertainty – whether utility – form of declarations sought – relief refused



Legislation:

Constitution ss 51, 109, 122

Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth) s 4

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 2-4, ss 19, 26, 27, 29, 52, 54, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 253

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21

Rail Safety National Law (NSW) ss 3, 12, 13, 14, 62, 64

Rail Safety (Adoption of National Law) Act 2012 (NSW)

Transport Administration Act 1988 (NSW) s 37

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) ss 5, 7, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 47, 50, 51, 60, 68, 85, 90, 272



Cases cited:

A. Raptis & Son v The State of South Australia (1977) 138 CLR 346

Adami v Maison de Luxe Ltd (1924) 35 CLR 143

Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564

ALDI Foods Pty Limited v Shop Distributive and Allied Employees Association [2017] HCA 53, (2017) 262 CLR 593

Amalgamated Collieries of W.A. Ltd v True (1938) 59 CLR 417

Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wardley (1980) 142 CLR 237

Aussie Airlines Pty Ltd v Australian Airlines Inc (1996) 68 FCR 406

Clancy v Butchers’ Shop Employees Union (1904) 1 CLR 181

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1009, (2016) 262 IR 176

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Hail Creek Coal Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 149

Crown Employee’s Salaries and Conditions Award [2008] NSWIRComm 209, (2008) 181 IR 245

Electrolux Home Products Pty Limited v The Australian Workers’ Union [2004] HCA 40, (2004) 221 CLR 309

Energy Australia Yallourn Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metal, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2018] FCAFC 146, (2018) 264 FCR 342

Ex parte McLean (1930) 43 CLR 472

Harrison v P & T Tube Mills Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 220, (2009) 181 IR 162

Health Services Union v Director-General, NSW Department of Health [2010] NSWIRComm 42, (2010) 193 IR 359

James Cook University v Ridd [2020] FCAFC 123, (2020) 278 FCR 566

Kucks v CSR Ltd (1996) 66 IR 182

Linfox Australia Pty Ltd v Transport Workers’ Union of Australia [2013] FCA 659, (2013) 213 FCR 479

Marmara v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd [2013] FCA 1351

Mees v Roads Corp [2003] FCA 410

Melbourne Fire and Emergency Services Board v United Firefighters’ Union of Australia [2005] AIRC 204

National Australia Bank Ltd v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd [2019] FCA 899

National Tertiary Education Industry Union v Swinburne University of Technology [2014] FCA 606

National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney [2020] FCA 1709, (2020) 302 IR 272

National Union of Workers v Qantas Airways Ltd [2013] FCA 976, (2013) 216 FCR 1

Newcrest Mining (WA) Ltd v The Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 513

NSW Trains [2018] FWCA 2319

One Key Workforce Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FCAFC 77, (2018) 262 FCR 527

Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd v Chasser [2011] VSC 597, (2011) 215 IR 411

R v Irvine [2009] VSCA 239, (2009) 25 VR 75

Rankin v Marine Power International Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 150, (2001) 107 IR 117

Re Aurizon Operations Ltd [2015] FWCFB 540, (2015) 249 IR 55

Re Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v NSW Trains [2020] FWC 4359

Re Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v NSW Trains [2021] FWCFB 1113

Re The Manufacturing Grocers’ Employees Federation of Australia; Ex parte the Australian Chamber of Manufactures (1986) 160 CLR 341

SOS Nursing & Home Care Services Pty Ltd v Smith [2013] FCA 295

The King v Darling Island Stevedoring Co Ltd; Ex parte Halliday (1938) 60 CLR 601

The King v Kelly; Ex parte the State of Victoria (1950) 81 CLR 64

The University of New South Wales v Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1

Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Marmara [2014] FCAFC 84, (2014) 222 FCR 152

Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 829, (2014) 318 ALR 54

Truth about Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd [2000] HCA 11, (2000) 200 CLR 591

United Firefighters’ Union of Australia v Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board [2013] FWCFB 2301, (2013) 233 IR 267

Viskauskas v Niland (1983) 153 CLR 280

Warramunda Village Inc v Pryde [2001] FCA 61, (2001) 105 FCR 437

Work Health Authority v Outback Ballooning Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 2, (2019) 266 CLR 428

Workpac Pty Ltd v Skene [2018] FCAFC 131, (2018) 264 FCR 536

Golding, Terms implied by law into employment contracts: Are they necessary? (2015) 28 AJLL 113



Division:

Fair Work Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Employment and Industrial Relations



Number of paragraphs:

251



Date of hearing:

5 – 7 July 2021



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr I Neil SC with Mr S Meehan, Mr M Seck and Ms R Kumar



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Lander & Rogers



Counsel for the Respondents:

Mr M Gibian SC with Ms L Saunders



Solicitor for the Respondents:

Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union



ORDERS


NSD 427 of 2021

BETWEEN:

NSW TRAINS

Applicant


AND:

AUSTRALIAN RAIL, TRAM AND BUS INDUSTRY UNION

First Respondent


PAUL DORNAN

Second Respondent


EDWARD DUNGER

Third Respondent



order made by:

FLICK J

DATE OF ORDER:

3 August 2021



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The Amended Originating Application filed on 2 June 2021 is dismissed.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

FLICK J:

  1. The Applicant in the present proceeding is NSW Trains. It is a corporation constituted under s 37(1)...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 firm's commentaries