Old Ugc Inc. v Industrial Relations Commission of Nsw in Court Session
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Callinan,Crennan JJ,Kirby J,Heydon J |
Judgment Date | 18 May 2006 |
Neutral Citation | [2006] HCA 24,2006-0518 HCA C |
Date | 18 May 2006 |
Court | High Court |
Docket Number | S209/2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
BHP Group Ltd v Impiombato
...at 75-76; Meyer Heine Pty Ltd v China Navigation Co Ltd (1966) 115 CLR 10 at 22-24; Old UGC Inc v Industrial Relations Commission (NSW) (2006) 225 CLR 274 at 283 [23]; Insight Vacations Pty Ltd v Young (2011) 243 CLR 149 at 161-162 [32]–[36]. 54 Federal Court of Australia Act, s 19. See als......
-
New South Wales v Commonwealth
...Batterham v QSR Ltd (2006) 80 ALJR 995; 227 ALR 212; Old UGC Inc v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session (2006) 80 ALJR 1018; 227 ALR 613 Joint reasons at [82]. 614 Meale, ‘The History of the Federal Idea in Australian Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Reappraisa......
-
Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
...Act 1958 (Cth), s 48A. 204Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 at 519; Old UGC Inc v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2006] HCA 24 at [52], 205 (1949) 78 CLR 62 at 91. See also Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 at 602. 206 (1964) 112 CLR 125 at 130. 207 Mabo v Queensla......
-
Batterham v Qsr Ltd
...Batterham and Maylord was heard at the same time as the appeals in Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd4 and Old UGC, Inc v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session5. 13 The relevant provisions of the Act, and their history, are set out in the reasons given in Fish v So......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
...6 Holdings Ltd (2006) 225 CLR 180; Batterham v QSR Ltd (2006) 225 CLR 237; and Old UGC Inc v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW (2006) 225 CLR 274. 41 The reasons are explained in Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd (2006) 225 CLR 180, 196 [44]. 42 The reasons why the critical provision did ......