Olsen v City of Camberwell

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Date1926
Year1926
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • Dunkley v Evans
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Greater London Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 397 ; [ 1970 ] 1 All E.R. 70 , H.L.(E.) ... Manchester City Council v. Greater Manchester Metropolitan County Council ( 1980 ) 78 L.G.R. 71 , C.A ... Olsen v. City of Camberwell [ 1926 ] V.L.R. 58 ... Patchett v. Leathem ( 1949 ) 65 T.L.R ... ...
  • DPP v Hutchinson
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 July 1990
    ...Ormrod L.J. cited, at pp. 1524-1525, the following passage from the judgment of Cussen J. in the Supreme Court of Victoria in Olsen v. City of Camberwell [1926] V.L.R. 58, 68: "'If the enactment, with the invalid portion omitted, is so radically or substantially different a law as to the s......
  • Thames Water Authority v Elmbridge Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 December 1982
    ...intact'. The principle is more fully formulated in the judgment of Mr. Justice Cussen sitting in the Supreme Court of Victoria in Olsen v. City of Camberwell (1926) Victoria Law Reports 58, at p.68 where he said: 'If the enactment, with the invalid portion omitted, is so radically or substa......
  • Get Started for Free