Opal Maritime Agencies Pty Ltd v Skulptor Konenkov
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 2000 |
| Neutral Citation | 2000-0419 FCA C |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
- Banwell v Ship Sydney Sunset
- Elbe Shipping Sa v Giant Marine Shipping Sa
- Scandinavian Bunkering as v the Bunkers on Board the Ship Fv "Taruman"
-
Elbe Shipping SA v Giant Marine Shipping SA
...“The Eschersheim” [1976] 1 WLR 430 considered Opal Maritime Agencies Pty Ltd v Proceeds of Sale of Vessel MV “Skulptor Konenkov” (2000) 172 ALR 481 Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 107 distinguished The Niobe (1888) 13 PD 55 discussed The Quickstep (189......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
List of cases
...AMC 2089Offi Gloria, The [1993] 3 NZLR 576Opal Maritime Agencies Pty Ltd v The Proceeds of the Sale of the Vessel MV Skulptor Konenkov (2000) 98 FCR 519Optima, The (1905) 10 Asp MLC 147Opy v Child (1693) 91 ER 33Orient Leasing Co v The Kosei Maru [1979] 1 FC 670Orienta, The [1895] P 49Orie......
-
2018 Dethridge Memorial Address
...Konenkov [1995] FCA 1607; The Skulptor Konenkov [1996] FCA 1257; The Skulptor Vuchetich (1996) 136 ALR 206; The Skulptor Konenkov [2000] FCA 507; Patrick Stevedores (No 2) Pty Ltd v The Proceeds of Sale of Vessel MV Skulptor Konenkov (1997) 144 ALR 394. 26 The Iron Shortland (1995) 131 ALR ......
-
The maritime lien and the present Australian admiralty law
...Act.144 Section 4(3)(m) of the Admiralty Act.145 Opal Marine Agencies Pty Ltd v The Proceeds of Sale of the Vessel MV Skulptor Konenkov (2000) 98 FCR 519 at 554.146 See paragraph 1.4. Apart from the fact that American law recognises a maritime lien for the supply of necessaries, there has b......
-
Introduction
...[1908] AC 458 at 466) and in Australia (Opal Maritime Agencies Pty Ltd v The Proceeds of the Sale of the Vessel MV “Skulptor Konenkov” (2000) 98 FCR 519 at 554 to 555) and is similar to the definition adopted in South Africa in In re The SS Mangoro 1913 NPD 67 at 82 to 83. See also P Mybur......