Opat v National Mutual Life
| Jurisdiction | Victoria |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Date | 1992 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- Allan Bryan v Judith Anne Maloney
-
Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v Cdg Pty Ltd
...Toohey J at 657 regarded the classification of the loss as pure economic loss as ‘debatable’. 281 [1997] 2 VR 525 at 528–529. 282 [1992] 1 VR 283 283 Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609 at 665. 284 Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609 at 630. 285 CAI Fences Pty Ltd v A Ravi (Builder) Pty L......
- Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v Cdg Pty Ltd
1 books & journal articles
-
Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd: beyond Bryan; builders' liability and pure economic loss.
...was previously acknowledged in Miell v Hatjopoulos (1987) 4 BCL 226; Opat v National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd [1992] 1 VR 283 (residential); National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd v Coffey & Partners Pty Ltd [1991] 2 Qd R 401 (22) See, eg, Building Act 200......