Osf and Ojk

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2004 FMCA fam 63
Year2004
Date2004
CourtFederal Magistrates Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
25 cases
  • Janet Adams Bostick v Hadley Wendell Bostick
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • 8 July 2022
    ...by the factors that courts are statutorily mandated to consider: see, for example, Kneen v Crawford [2011] FMCAfam 372 and OSF v OJK (2004) FMCAfam 63. Others support the view that it is not: see, for example, In the Marriage of Marinko [1985] F.L.C. 91–609 at 79,944 and Stanford v Stanford......
  • Smith v Smith
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • 11 December 2015
    ...to determine this case but I respectfully adopt the explication of the nature of this so-called fourth step by Walters FM in OSF v OJK (2004) FMCA fam 63 and do not regard this step as a substantive fourth step as such.”. THE MATRIMONIAL ASSETS 27 The Husband claims an interest in the chatt......
  • Kernahan & Kernahan
    • Australia
    • Federal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Erdem & Ozsoy
    • Australia
    • Federal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free