Pacific Brands Sport & Leisure Pty Ltd v Underworks Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2005
Neutral Citation2006-0323 FCA A,2005-0322 FCA C
Date2005
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
45 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Termination For Convenience
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 5 August 2013
    ...see, for example, Kellogg v Australian Aerospace [2007] VSC 200 at paragraph 56). In Pacific Brands Sport & Leisure v Underworks [2005] FCA 288 (Federal Court of Australia), the judge described the duty (obiter) as "... the duty of good faith is an incident (not an ad hoc implied term) ......
2 books & journal articles
  • GOOD FAITH IN THE PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS REVISITED
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...67 See, eg, Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Air Services Australia(1997) 76 FCR 151; Pacific Brands Pty Ltd v Underworks Pty Ltd[2005] FCA 288; Alcatel Australia Ltd v Scarcella(1998) 44 NSWLR 349; Burger King Corp v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd[2001] NSWCA 187; Vodafone Pacific Ltd v Mobi......
  • Good faith and Post-Repudiation Conduct
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 40-1, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...Aust Pty Ltd v Subaru (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 903, [37] (Finkelstein J); Pacific Brands Sport & Leisure Pty Ltd v Underworks Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 288, [65] (Finkelstein J). 88See Tyrone Carlin, above n 57 (Australian context); See also David James, ‘Why a Common Law Duty of Contractual Good......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT