Pacific National (Act) Ltd v Queensland Rail

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2006
Neutral Citation2006-0216 FCA G
Year2006
Date2006
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pacific National Pty Limited (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 May 2019
    ...Aurizon in litigation between them about the control of the ART between 2003 and 2006 (Pacific National (ACT) Limited v Queensland Rail [2006] FCA 91). I might say that reference to that authority has not been useful to me in the present case, which needs to be decided on the present eviden......
  • Commerce Commission v Telecom Corporation of NZ Ltd and
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 4 August 2009
    ...216 CLR 53; NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power and Water Authority (2004) 219 CLR 90; and Pacific National (ACT) Ltd v Queensland Rail [2006] FCA 91. [54] An intermediate appellate court is always in a difficult position when with this sort of issue. On the one hand, there is the high desi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Australia
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Competition Laws Outside the United States. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 2 February 2020
    ...¶ 498. 48. [2007] F.C.A. 1062. 49 Id. ¶ 1787. 50 [2003] F.C.A. 1525. 51. Id. ¶ 498; see also Pacific Nat’l (ACT) Rail v. Queensland Rail [2006] F.C.A. 91; In re Qantas Airways [2004] A.T.P.R. 42-027. For further commentary, see Robert Baxt, THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF TYING, BUNDLING, AND OTHE......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT