Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1985-0205 HCA C,[1985] HCA 3 |
| Date | 1985 |
| Year | 1985 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
34 cases
-
John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Gacic
...All ER 1237. See reasons of Gleeson CJ and Crennan J at [2]. 75 See, for example, Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLR 7 at 20, 32; Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 at 484-488; Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994......
-
Imbree v McNeilly; McNeilly v Imbree
...at 382 per Mason, Wilson, Deane and Dawson JJ. 115 (1948) 77 CLR 39 at 46. 116 cf Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLR 7 at 36 per Deane J; [1985] HCA 117 (1948) 77 CLR 39 at 57. 118 (1948) 77 CLR 39 at 46 per Latham CJ. 119 (1986) 162 CLR 376 at 388. 120 (1......
-
Jones v Bartlett
...99 at 100; Griggs, (1998) 6 Australian Property Law Journal 169 at 170–171. 214 Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLR 7 at 16–20; Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 at 484 488; Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 1......
-
Brodie v Singleton Shire Council
...1 at 250–251; Esso (1999) 201 CLR 49 at 87–88 [101]. 364 [1932] AC 562. 365 eg Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLR 7 at 20, 38; Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 at 484–488; Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 1......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Nature of duty of care owed by occupiers of domestic premises to ten year old boy who fell whilst descending from top bunk of bed - s 5B Civil Liability Act
...not as stringent as is owed by the occupier of commercial premises. Beazley JA, Tobias JA and Macfarlan JA [1980] HCA 12 [2009] NSWCA 263 [1985] HCA 3 [1980] HCA 12 [2008] EWCA Civ 907 [2007] HCA 42 [2000] HCA 56 (2003) NSWCA 152 The content of this article is intended to provide a general ......
2 books & journal articles
-
The site
...of occupiers’ liability legislation (discussed later in this chapter): see Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLr 7; Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLr 479; Ratclif v McConnell [1999] 1 WLr 670 (Ca); Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 2......
-
Case Note
OCCUPIER'S LIABILITY AND NEGLIGENCE
...Shire Council(1963) 110 CLR 74; see also Hackshaw v Shaw(1984) 155 CLR 614 and Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission(1985) 156 CLR 7. 36 An Asian homage to the Greek Ship of Theseus referred to in See Toh Siew Kee v Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) Ltd[2013] 3 SLR 284. Lord Jaga......