Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1982] HCA 44,1982-0811 HCA B |
| Year | 1982 |
| Date | 1982 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
401 cases
- Campomar Sociedad Ltda v Nike International Ltd
- Accc v Woolworths Ltd
- Tec & Tomas (Australia) Pty Ltd v Matsumiya Computer Company Pty Ltd
- Toben v Jones
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Fine print in ad not good enough, says High Court of Australia
...Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2012) 210 FCR 277. 3Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191. 4Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR Winner - EOWA Employer of Choice for Wome......
-
Google Adwords And The Use Of Competitors' Trade Marks On The Internet
...Pty Limited v Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd (2001) 53 IPR 481 at 515 13. Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 1 14. ibid at 15. ibid at 4-16 16. ibid at 15, 16 17. Brinkema J, Memorandum Opinion, Government Employees Insurance Company v Google Inc. et al, U......
-
Plunger wars: Latest decision bodes well for Bodum
...the famous decision of the High Court of Australia in Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 in 1982, it has been commonly accepted that a rival trader can copy someone else's product with impunity (unless the product is protected by statutory intellectual......
-
FSR GPS: When Is An Incorrect Misstatement Not Misleading Or Deceptive?
...ACCC v Dateline Imports Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 114, [179] and ASIC v CBA, [82]. 4. Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44, [9] (Gibbs 5. Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592, [109]. The content of this article is intended to provide a gen......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
...51Freely Pte Ltd v Ong Kaili[2010] 2 SLR 1065 at [45], per Woo Bih Li J. See similarly Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu(1982) 149 CLR 191 at 197–198, per Gibbs CJ. 52RBC Properties Pte Ltd v Defu Furniture Pte Ltd[2015] 1 SLR 997 at [77]. 53Freely Pte Ltd v Ong Kaili[2010] 2 S......
-
The Intersection between Registered and Unregistered Trade Marks
...[2006] ATMO 84, [12] (Hearing Officer Williams); Coloplast A/S v Ezy Products Pty Ltd [2007] ATMO 60, [33] (Hearing Officer Dunn). 37 (1982) 149 CLR 191 ('Parkdale'), 198. See also at 210 (Mason J). 384 Federal Law Review Volume 35 ___________________________________________________________......
-
DISENTANGLING FUNCTIONALITY, DISTINCTIVENESS AND USE IN AUSTRALIAN TRADE MARK LAW.
...courts would not find that a misrepresentation had occurred. See generally Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 and, for the equivalent approach in the United Kingdom in a passing off case, see Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR ......
-
The fair competition act, 1993 (Jamaica) - analysis and comment
...fact acted. 21 This analysis would require an actual 19 See n.8, supra. 20 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Co Pty Ltd. v. Puxu Pty Ltd. (1982) 149 CLR 191. McWilliarn’s Wines Ltd. v. McDonald’s System of Australia Pty Ltd. (1980) 49 FLR 455, (1980) ATPR para.40-188, Taco Co of Australia Pty......