Parkin and Cowper v James

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1905-0419 HCA B
Date1905
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • C A Macdonald Ltd v South Australian Railways Commissioner
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Ffrost v Stevenson (1937) 58 CLR 528
    • Papua New Guinea
    • High Court
    • 13 Agosto 1937
    ...6 CLR 255, an interpretation which so far this court has shown no disposition to place upon them (Cp. Parkin and Cowper v James 68 (1905) 2 CLR 315 at 330). Perhaps it should be added that, if a justice of the High Court acted under Statutory Rule 1930 No. 147, an appeal from his order woul......
  • OâÇÖSULLIVAN v IRISH PRISON SERVICE
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 Mayo 2010
    ...v. Cassidy (No. 2) [1995] 1 I.L.R.M. 311. Orange Ltd. v. Director of Telecoms (No. 2) [2000] 4 I.R. 159. Parkin and Cowper v. James (1905) 2 C.L.R. 315. R. v. Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 K.B. 256; [1923] All E.R. 233. Radio Limerick One Ltd. v. Independent Radio and Televisi......
  • O'Sullivan v Chief Executive of the Irish Prison Service and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 Mayo 2010
    ...Indeed, in speaking of the earlier practice as to appeals to the Privy Council, their Honours said: [in Parkin and Cowper v. James (1905) 2 CLR 315], at p 333" 109 'In one sense, and we think the truer sense, every appeal lay as of right. In some cases it lay as of course upon compliance wi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 Marzo 2005
    ...the referral of a matter from a _____________________________________________________________________________________ 103 Parkin v James (1905) 2 CLR 315, 332–3 (the Court). Cf Quick and Garran, above n 36, 739–40; Collins v Charles Marshall (1955) 92 CLR 529, 543–4 (Dixon CJ, McTiernan, Wi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT