Patterson, Re; ex parte Taylor

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Date2001
Year2001

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
144 cases
  • Wight v Pearce
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Akpata v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v SZGUR
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 September 2011
    ...[15], 120 [28]. 58 (2009) 83 ALJR 1123 at 1129 [25]; 259 ALR 429 at 436. 59 See authorities collected in Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 453 [189], fn 214; [2001] HCA 60 (2004) 78 ALJR 992 at 999 [43], 1019–1020 [124]; 207 ALR 12 at 21–22, 49. See also Minister for Im......
  • Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 September 2004
    ...(1997) 189 CLR 520. 6 (1997) 189 CLR 520 at 557. 7 (1975) 135 CLR 1 . 8 (1996) 186 CLR 140 . 9 (1975) 135 CLR 1 at 23–24. 10 (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 402–403 [14]. 11 See La Nauze, The Making of the Australian Constitution, (1972) at 95. 12Attorney-General (Cth); Ex rel McKinlay v The Commonwe......
  • Get Started for Free
18 books & journal articles
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...Skinner, Visions of Politics Volume II Renaissance Values (Cambridge UniversityPress, 2002) 368.180. Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 409–10 [41] (Gaudron J); Re Minister forImmigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Meng Kok Te (2002) 212 CLR 162, 179 [54]–[55], 180–1......
  • Prohibiting the Conscription of State Officers for Commonwealth Purposes: An American Future for the State Immunity Doctrine?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-3, September 2007
    • 1 September 2007
    ...See Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511. 155 Hills, above n 64, 826. 156 First Uniform Tax Case (1942) 65 CLR 373, 429. 157 (2001) 207 CLR 391. 158 Ibid 460. 426 Federal Law Review Volume 35 ____________________________________________________________________________________ consi......
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...112 (1925) 37 CLR 36, 135, cited with approval in Communist Party Case (1951) 83 CLR 1, 269 (Fullagar J); Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 443–4 [157] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408, 469 (McHugh J); R v Hughes (2000) 202 C......
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014), 621 (citing Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 419-20, 453), 623 (citing Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353, 360 (Dixon J)). 482 Federal Law Review Vo......
  • Get Started for Free