Patterson, Re; ex parte Taylor

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Date2001
Year2001
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
144 cases
  • Wight v Pearce
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Akpata v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Combet v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 Octubre 2005
    ...the special case for the opinion of the Full Court should have been answered as proposed by McHugh J. 1 Re Patterson ; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 401–403 2Attorney-General (Vict) v The Commonwealth (1945) 71 CLR 237 at 254 per Latham CJ. 3Victoria v The Commonwealth and Hayden (1......
  • Aaron Joe Thomas Graham(Plaintiff) v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 Septiembre 2017
    ...Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 416 at 502–503; [1996] HCA 56; Tajjour v New South Wales (2014) 254 CLR 508 at 586 [171]; [2014] HCA 35. 53 (2001) 207 CLR 391; [2001] HCA 54 (2001) 207 CLR 391 at 455 [196]. See also at 420 [83]. 55 Windeyer, ‘History in Law and Law in History’, (1973) 11 Albert......
  • Get Started for Free
22 books & journal articles
  • Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 Diciembre 2002
    ...available and have associations beyond jurisdictional error: Abebe (1999) 197 CLR 510, 551-2 (Gaudron J); Re Patterson,' Exparte Taylor (2001) 182 ALR 657, 742 (Kirby J); John Basten, `The Original Jurisdiction of the High Court: A Constitutional Guarantee of Due Process?' (Paper presented ......
  • 'An "alien" by the barest of threads' - the legality of the deportation of long-term residents from Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 2, August 2009
    • 1 Agosto 2009
    ...label 'denizenship' to describe this membership status of resident 'aliens.' See also at 152, 174. (34) Re Patterson; Exparte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 409 (Gaudron J) ('Re (35) See generally Kim Rubenstein, Australian Citizenship Law in Context (2002) chs 2, 4; Helen Irving, 'Still Call A......
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 Marzo 2007
    ...112 (1925) 37 CLR 36, 135, cited with approval in Communist Party Case (1951) 83 CLR 1, 269 (Fullagar J); Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 443–4 [157] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408, 469 (McHugh J); R v Hughes (2000) 202 C......
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 Septiembre 2011
    ...State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014), 621 (citing Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 419-20, 453), 623 (citing Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353, 360 (Dixon J)). 482 Federal Law Review Vo......
  • Get Started for Free