Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date16 October 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCAFC 177
Date16 October 2020
CourtFederal Court
Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177

Appeal from:

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2019] FCA 1654



File number:

VID 1220 of 2019



Judges:

ALLSOP CJ, BESANKO, WHITE, WIGNEY AND BROMWICH JJ



Date of judgment:

16 October 2020



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – civil penalties – agreed contraventions – false or misleading statement about an obligation to engage in “industrial activity” – determination of appropriate penalty – principles relating to imposition of pecuniary penalties – whether principle of proportionality, drawn from criminal law, is applicable – discussion of principle of proportionality as applied in criminal law – whether history of contravening should inform the court’s assessment of an appropriate penalty in the instant case – whether imposition of maximum penalties to serial recidivist justified – whether total penalty manifestly excessive – whether cooperation can be treated as a factor in mitigation warranting a discount on penalty where unaccompanied by contrition



Legislation:

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 347(a), 349(1), 363, 545, 546, 547



Cases cited:

A & L Silvestri Pty Limited v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2008] FCA 466

Amos v McCarron [2017] ACTSC 6

Auimatagi v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2018] FCAFC 191; 267 FCR 268

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 53; 249 FCR 458

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; 254 FCR 68

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3; 262 CLR 157

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Syme Library Case) (No 2) [2019] FCA 1555

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Nine Brisbane Sites Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 59; 269 FCR 262

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hassett [2019] FCA 855

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Powell (No 2) [2019] FCA 972

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission and Distribution Limited [2001] FCA 383; ATPR ¶41-815

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] FCA 1516; 118 ACSR 124

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 159; 258 FCR 312

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2007] FCAFC 146; 161 FCR 513

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 698

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v J McPhee & Son (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 5) [1998] FCA 310; ATPR ¶41-628

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; 262 FCR 243

Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith [2008] FCAFC 8; 165 FCR 560

Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483; 42 ACSR 80

Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58

Baumer v The Queen [1988] HCA 67; 166 CLR 51

Bensegger v The Queen [1979] WAR 65

Benter v Western Australia [2005] WASCA 245

Birch v Fitzgerald (1975) 11 SASR 114

Bugmy v The Queen [1990] HCA 18; 169 CLR 525

Cain v Glass (No 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 230

Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027

Chester v The Queen [1988] HCA 62; 165 CLR 611

Comcare v Banerji [2019] HCA 23; 372 ALR 42

Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Broadway on Ann Case) [2018] FCAFC 126; 265 FCR 208

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner & Anor [2018] HCASL 380 (5 December 2018)

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2018] FCAFC 97; 264 FCR 155

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2016] FCAFC 184; 247 FCR 339

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; 194 IR 461

Dirbass v The Queen [2018] VSCA 272

Director of Public Prosecutions v Ottewell [1970] AC 642

Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2015] FCA 1462

Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2016] FCA 436

Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Robinson [2016] FCA 525; 241 FCR 338

Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCAFC 59; 229 FCR 331

Dixon v Price (1996) 135 FLR 27

Dobson v Tasmania [2017] TASCCA 19; 269 A Crim R 222

Eldridge v Bates [1989] SASC 1268; 51 SASR 532

Elhassan v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 118

Elias v The Queen [2013] HCA 31; 248 CLR 483

Ellis v The Queen [2005] NTCCA 1; 154 A Crim R 450

Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 53; 260 FCR 68

Gapes v Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd [1979] FCA 62; 38 FLR 431

Gilshenan v The Queen [2019] NSWCCA 313

Gommesen v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 226

Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462

Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520

Hillier v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565

Hoare v The Queen [1989] HCA 33; 167 CLR 348

Ibbs v The Queen [1987] HCA 46; 163 CLR 447

Keating v Western Australia [2007] WASCA 98; 35 WAR 1

Kelly v Fitzpatrick [2007] FCA 1080; 166 IR 14

Magaming v The Queen [2013] HCA 40; 252 CLR 381

Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357

Marshall v Llewellyn (1995) 79 A Crim R 49

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2017] FCAFC 33; 248 FCR 1

Mount Bruce Mining Pty Limited v Wright Prospecting Pty Limited [2015] HCA 37; 256 CLR 104

NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134; 71 FCR 285

Papaconstuntinos v Holmes à Court [2012] HCA 53; 249 CLR 534

Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56; 270 FCR 39

Police v Cadd [1997] SASC 6187; 69 SASR 150

Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 65; 158 FCR 543

R v Baumer (1989) 40 A Crim R 74

R v Bukvic [2010] SASC 195; 107 SASR 405

R v Dole [1975] VR 754

R v Haji-Noor [2007] NTCCA 7; 21 NTLR 127

R v Kilic [2016] HCA 48; 259 CLR 256

R v McInerney (1986) 42 SASR 111

R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566

R v Mulholland (1991) 1 NTLR 1; 102 FLR 465

R v O’Brien [1997] 2 VR 714

R v Omar (1991) 55 A Crim R 373

R v Tait [1979] FCA 32; 46 FLR...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
64 cases
  • Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Ingham (The 180 Brisbane Construction Case) (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 March 2021
    ...FCR 513; [2007] FCAFC 146 Parker (2019) 270 FCR 39; [2019] FCAFC 56 Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (2020) 384 ALR 75; [2020] FCAFC 177 PIA Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v King (2020) 292 (IR) 317; [2020] FCAFC 15 Registered Organisations Commissioner v Australian ......
  • Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Regional Express Holdings Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 December 2021
    ...Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56; 270 FCR 39 Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177; 384 ALR 75 R v Alexander [2007] VSCA 178; 174 A Crim R 297 R v Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd; Ex parte Federated Miscellaneous Workers Union (1957......
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 28 July 2022
    ...Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44; 149 CLR 191 Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177; 282 FCR 580 Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd [1921] 2 AC 438 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 55......
  • Tax Practitioners Board v Hacker (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 18 December 2020
    ...v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (2019) 270 FCR 39 Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (2020) 384 ALR 75; [2020] FCAFC 177 Pelechowski v Registrar, Court of Appeal (NSW) (1999) 198 CLR 435 Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 1......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries