Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeMURPHY J
Judgment Date17 January 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 619
Date17 January 2020
CourtFederal Court
Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619


File number:

QUD 714 of 2016



Judge:

MURPHY J



Date of judgment:

17 January 2020



Date of publication of reasons:

8 May 2020



Catchwords:

REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – application for court approval of settlement under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – claim by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workers in respect of wages earned but not paid between 1939 and 1972 –relevant principles in relation to settlement approval – whether the settlement amount is fair and reasonable – whether proposed deductions including for legal costs and funding commission are fair and reasonable – consideration of objections to the settlement – the operation of the extant common fund order – settlement approved



Legislation:

Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth)

Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)

Imperial Acts Application Act 1984 (Qld)

Limitation Act 1960 (Qld)

Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)

Statute of Frauds and Limitations 1867 (Qld)

Succession Act 1981 (Qld)

The Aboriginals Preservation and Protection Act of 1939 (Qld)

The Aborigines’ and Torres Strait Islanders’ Affairs Act 1965 (Qld)

The Aborigines’ and Torres Strait Islanders’ Regulations of 1966

The Torres Strait Islanders Act of 1939 (Qld)

The Aboriginals Regulations of 1945 (Qld)

The Islanders Regulations 1946 (Qld)

Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 (Imp)

Slavery Abolition Act 1833 (Imp)



Cases cited:

Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (Recs & Mgrs Apptd) (In Liq) (No 3) [2017] FCA 330; (2017) 343 ALR 476

BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster [2019] HCA 45 (2019) 374 ALR 627

Breen v Williams [1996] HCA 57; (1996) 186 CLR 71

Caason Investments Pty Ltd v Cao (No 2) [2018] FCA 527

Camilleri v Trust Company (Nominees) Ltd [2015] FCA 1468

Chubb Insurance Co of Australia Ltd v Moore [2013] NSWCA 212; (2013) 302 ALR 101

Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447

Cubillo v Commonwealth of Australia [2001] FCA 1213; (2001) 112 FCR 455

Darwalla Milling Co Ltd v F Hoffman-La Roche (No 2) [2006] FCA 1388; (2006) 236 ALR 322

Earglow Pty Ltd v Newcrest Mining Limited [2016] FCA 1433

Forbes v Cochrane (1824) 107 ER 450

Grant v John Grant & Sons [1954] HCA 23; (1954) 91 CLR 112

Kelly v Willmott Forests Ltd (in liquidation) (No 4) [2016] FCA 323; (2016) 335 ALR 439

Kuterba v Sirtex Medical Ltd (No 3) [2019] FCA 1374

Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited v S&P Global Inc (Formerly McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc) (A Company Incorporated in New York) [2018] FCA 379

Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; (1992) 175 CLR 1

Money Max Int Pty Limited (Trustee) v QBE Insurance Group Limited [2016] FCAFC 148; (2016) 338 ALR 188

Pearson v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 1096

Santa Trade Concerns Pty Limited v Robinson (No 2) [2018] FCA 1491

Somerset v Stewart (1772) 98 ER 499

State of New South Wales v Kable [2013] HCA 26; (2013) 252 CLR 118

Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Collins; Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Tomes [2016] HCA 44; (2016) 259 CLR 212

Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106

Wik Peoples v Queensland [1996] HCA 40; (1996) 187 CLR 1

Williams v The Minister, Aboriginal Land Rights Act & Anor (1994) 35 NSWLR 497

Wotton v State of Queensland (No 11) [2018] FCA 1841



Date of hearing:

21 November, 11 December, 19 December 2019



Registry:

Queensland



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

297



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr D J Campbell QC, Mr J Creamer, Mr A Newman and Mr A Edwards



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Bottoms English Lawyers



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr A Crowe QC, Mr C Murdoch QC and Ms G Dann



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Crown Law



Counsel for the Intervener:

Mr L Armstrong QC and Mx N Chow



ORDERS


QUD 714 of 2016

BETWEEN:

HANS PEARSON

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF QUEENSLAND

Respondent



LITIGATION LENDING SERVICES LTD

Intervener



JUDGE:

MURPHY J

DATE OF ORDER:

17 JANUARY 2020



OTHER MATTERS:


A. The Court notes that the common fund order, Order 2 of the Orders made on 25 August 2017, continues in effect.


AND THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


Confidentiality

  1. Pursuant to ss 37AF and 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (the Act), and to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice, each of:

    1. Exhibits JT1, JT2, the second sentence of paragraph 21 and paragraph 22 of the Second Affidavit of Jerry Tucker filed 19 November 2019;

    2. Exhibit JB1 of the Sixth Affidavit of John Bottoms filed 13 December 2019;

    3. the Applicant’s confidential submissions in response to Mr Msii’s submissions, filed 10 December 2019,

shall be treated as confidential and, subject to further order of the Court:

      1. the relevant exhibits, affidavits and submissions be sealed on the Court file in envelopes marked Not to be opened except by leave of the Court or a Judge and are not to be published or made available in the Registry or on the Court’s internet platform;

      2. not disclosed to any person other than:

1. the Court;

2. the Applicant and his legal representatives;

3. LLS and its legal representatives;

4. upon the giving of a confidentiality undertaking in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Applicant or approved by the Court – group members and their legal representatives.

Group member registration

  1. The 168 persons referred to at paragraph 17 of the Sixth Affidavit of Jerry Tucker filed 17 December 2019, being persons from Papua New Guinea who have provided registration forms to Bottoms English Lawyers (BELAW), are deemed to have been registered in...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Limited (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 April 2020
    ...(1880) 5 App Cas 176 Pathway Investments Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (No 3) [2012] VSC 625 Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619 Rushleigh Services Pty Ltd v Forge Group Limited (In Liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2019] FCA 2113 Trustees v Greenough 105 U.S.......
  • Court v Spotless Group Holdings Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 September 2020
    ...Ltd [2016] FCA 1194 P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd v Brookfield Multiplex Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 1029 Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619 Perera v GetSwift Limited [2018] FCA 732; (2018) 263 FCR 1 State of New South Wales v Kable [2013] HCA 26; (2013) 252 CLR 118 Timbercorp Financ......
  • Asirifi-Otchere v Swann Insurance (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 December 2020
    ...Navigation Company v William Millar Wilson (1880) 5 App Cas 176 Nissen v Grunden (1912) 14 CLR 297 Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619 Perera v GetSwift Limited [2018] FCA 732; (2018) 263 FCR 1 Re Masters [1953] 1 WLR 81 Re Moore [1956] VLR 132 Smith v Commonwealth of Austra......
  • Jenkings v Northern Territory of Australia (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 26 July 2021
    ...120 ALD 16 Wong v Silkfield [2000] FCA 1421 Wotton v State of Queensland (No 10) [2018] FCA 915 Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619 Division: General Division Registry: Northern Territory National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdicto speak to in order to understand the se......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • PUBLIC INTEREST COSTS ORDERS IN FEDERAL CLASS ACTIONS: TIME FOR A NEW APPROACH.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 2, April 2022
    • 1 April 2022
    ...See also DBE17 [No 2] (n 150) [23] (Mortimer J); Pearson v Queensland [2017] FCA 1096, [14] (Murphy J); Pearson v Queensland [No 2] [2020] FCA 619, [294], [297] (Murphy J) ('Pearson [No (186) Vince Morabito, 'Government Has Shelled Out $1.1B in Class Actions', Lawyerly (Web Page, 23 July 20......