Peel v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1971-1123 HCA A,[1971] HCA 59
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 cases
  • Bui v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 February 2012
    ...sentence. That entitlement was explained by this Court in Rohde v Director of Public Prosecutions1 applying the reasoning of Gibbs J in Peel v The Queen2. Section 287 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), like its predecessor s 567A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) which was considered in R......
  • Gte (Australia) Pty Ltd v Brown
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Markarian v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 May 2005
    ...that as it may, in face of the totality of the statutory provisions and the principles for which I have cited Veen v The Queen (No 2) 14 and R v Peel 15, it seems to me that the maximum prescribed for the supply of 250 g is not too high a starting point. In R v Perrier (No 2) 16, the Victor......
  • Putland v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 12 February 2004
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT