Peel v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1971-1123 HCA A,[1971] HCA 59
Date1971
Year1971
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 cases
  • Bui v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 February 2012
    ...sentence. That entitlement was explained by this Court in Rohde v Director of Public Prosecutions1 applying the reasoning of Gibbs J in Peel v The Queen2. Section 287 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), like its predecessor s 567A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) which was considered in R......
  • Gte (Australia) Pty Ltd v Brown
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Solomons v District Court of New South Wales
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 October 2002
    ...King (1932) 48 CLR 251 at 256–257 related to appeals following convictions in a State court. 116 (1932) 48 CLR 251. 117Peel v The Queen (1971) 125 CLR 447; Rohde v Director of Public Prosecutions (1986) 161 CLR 119. 118 (1956) 95 CLR 106. 119 (1956) 95 CLR 106 at 110. 120Peel v The Queen (1......
  • Wong v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 November 2001
    ...340 at 363 [125]. 37 (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 at 363 [126]. 38 See also (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 at 372 [190] per Simpson J. 39 Peel v The Queen (1971) 125 CLR 447. See also Seaegg v The King (1932) 48 CLR 251; Williams v The King [No 1] (1933) 50 CLR 536; Williams v The King [No 2] (1934) 50 CLR 551......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT