Peel v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1971-1123 HCA A,[1971] HCA 59
Date1971
Year1971
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
32 cases
  • Bui v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 February 2012
    ...sentence. That entitlement was explained by this Court in Rohde v Director of Public Prosecutions1 applying the reasoning of Gibbs J in Peel v The Queen2. Section 287 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), like its predecessor s 567A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) which was considered in R......
  • Attorney-General (Cth) v Huynh
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 May 2023
    ...Judiciary Act 1932 (Cth). 52 (1932) 48 CLR 251. 53 See R v LK (2010) 241 CLR 177 at 188-189 [14]-[16]. 54 (1934) 50 CLR 551 at 560. 55 (1971) 125 CLR 447 at 457, 460, 467-468. 56 (1986) 161 CLR 119 at 124-125. 57 (2010) 241 CLR 177 at 187-191 [12]-[20], 215-216 [86]. 58 (2003) 212 CLR 230. ......
  • The Queen v LK
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 26 May 2010
    ...an order for discharge from custody made upon the return of the writ of habeas corpus 38. 18 The question was revisited in 1971 in Peel v The Queen39. The Court then held by majority that s 68(2) operated upon s 5D of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) to confer jurisdiction on the Court of......
  • Putland v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 12 February 2004
  • Get Started for Free