Pekar v Holden (Trustee)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | MOSHINSKY J |
| Judgment Date | 03 April 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] FCA 442 |
| Date | 03 April 2019 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Pekar v Jess (Trustee)
...of “7 years from the end of the administration”. The definition has no application outside of Schedule 2. As Moshinsky J held in Pekar [2019] FCA 442 at [70], property vested in a trustee in bankruptcy continues to be so vested after the discharge of the bankrupt and remains subject to cred......
-
Pekar, in the matter of Pekar
...The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Pekar v Rickards Legal (No 3) [2017] FCCA 1196 Pekar v Holden [2021] FCA 141 Pekar v Holden (Trustee) [2019] FCA 442 Pekar v Holden (Trustee) (No 2) [2019] FCA 1212 Pekar v Holden (Trustee) (No 3) [2019] FCA 1928 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Lt......
-
Pekar v Holden
...Cases cited: Pekar v Holden (Trustee) (No 2) [2019] FCA 1212 Pekar v Holden (Trustee) (No 3) [2019] FCA 1928 Pekar v Holden (Trustee) [2019] FCA 442 Pekar v Rickards Legal (No 3) [2017] FCCA 1196 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Re Singh, in the application of......
-
Pekar v Holden (Trustee) (No 2)
...2019, I delivered reasons for judgment in respect of the contentions raised by Mr Pekar in this proceeding: Pekar v Holden (Trustee) [2019] FCA 442 (the April 2019 Reasons). These reasons should be read together with the April 2019 Reasons. I will adopt the abbreviations used in the April 2......
Request a trial to view additional results