Peters v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1998] HCA 7,1998-0202 HCA D
Date1998
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
83 cases
  • DPP v Bowe
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 June 2017
    ...relating to an offence of dishonesty and the decision was rejected in the specific context of conspiracy to defraud in Australia ( Peters v. The Queen [1998] 192 CLR 493) and in Canada (Theroux [1993] 2 SCR 5). Furthermore, the decision in Ghosh turned on the provisions of the Theft Act 196......
  • Azzopardi v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 May 2001
    ...229BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 at 310 per McHugh J; Green v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 334 at 397 per Kirby J; Peters v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 493 at 554 [142] per Kirby 230 (1993) 178 CLR 217 . 231 (1997) 45 NSWLR 744 . 232 (2000) 199 CLR 620 at 634–635 [35]. 233 cf (2000) 199 CLR 6......
  • Mccarthy v St Paul International Insurance Company Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • The Queen v LK
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 26 May 2010
    ...159. The difficulties of dividing the offence of conspiracy at common law into actus reus and mens rea was pointed out by McHugh J in Peters v The Queen160. As he said, the agreement which is the actus reus necessarily also includes a mental element 161: ‘At the very least, there must be an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
8 books & journal articles
  • Can Dishonesty Be Salvaged? Theft and the Grounding of the MSC Napoli
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-1, February 2010
    • 1 February 2010
    ...in the Criminal Law (Hart: Oxford, 2004)ch. 4. An article in support of the decision of the Australian High Court in Peters vR(1998) 192 CLR 493 to apply a similar test to that in Feely (rather than Ghosh) isC. R. Williams, ‘The Shifting Meaning of Dishonesty’ [1999] 23 Criminal LawJournal ......
  • A PURPOSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETING AUSTRALIA'S COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REGIME.
    • Australia
    • 1 December 2019
    ...voluntary act, if foreseen by the defendant, can infer intention. (76) See, eg, He Kaw Teh (n 72) 569 (Brennan J); Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493, 522 [68] (McHugh J); R v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464, 469 (Gibbs CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane and Dawson JJ); Vallance v The Queen (1961) 108......
  • Money for nothing, cheques for free? The meaning of 'financial advantage' in fraud offences.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...the term was used: see above Part III. (186) See above Part III(D)(2)(e). (187) [1964] AC 210. (188) [1989] AC 971. (189) R v Peters (1998) 192 CLR 493. (190) The dishonesty attaches to the obtaining, not the deception: R v Salvo [1980] VR 401; R v Love (1989) 17 NSWLR (191) Lanham, above n......
  • SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2007: “AUSTRALIA’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMMON LAW”
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...Frankland v The Queen [1987] AC 577. 12 [1999] 1 AC 82 at 90. 13 [1982] QB 1053. 14 [2002] 2 AC 164 at 171—175. 15 Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493. 16 Macleod v The Queen (2003) 214 CLR 230. 17 (2007) 81 ALJR 1107. 18 (1874) LRA Ch App 244 at 251—252. 19 (2007) 81 ALJR 1107 at 1147, [......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT