Peters v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1998] HCA 7,1998-0202 HCA D
Year1998
Date1998
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
88 cases
  • DPP v Bowe
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 June 2017
    ...relating to an offence of dishonesty and the decision was rejected in the specific context of conspiracy to defraud in Australia ( Peters v. The Queen [1998] 192 CLR 493) and in Canada (Theroux [1993] 2 SCR 5). Furthermore, the decision in Ghosh turned on the provisions of the Theft Act 196......
  • Mccarthy v St Paul International Insurance Company Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
8 books & journal articles
  • Can Dishonesty Be Salvaged? Theft and the Grounding of the MSC Napoli
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-1, February 2010
    • 1 February 2010
    ...in the Criminal Law (Hart: Oxford, 2004)ch. 4. An article in support of the decision of the Australian High Court in Peters vR(1998) 192 CLR 493 to apply a similar test to that in Feely (rather than Ghosh) isC. R. Williams, ‘The Shifting Meaning of Dishonesty’ [1999] 23 Criminal LawJournal ......
  • A PURPOSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETING AUSTRALIA'S COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REGIME.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 2, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...voluntary act, if foreseen by the defendant, can infer intention. (76) See, eg, He Kaw Teh (n 72) 569 (Brennan J); Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493, 522 [68] (McHugh J); R v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464, 469 (Gibbs CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane and Dawson JJ); Vallance v The Queen (1961) 108......
  • Money for nothing, cheques for free? The meaning of 'financial advantage' in fraud offences.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...the term was used: see above Part III. (186) See above Part III(D)(2)(e). (187) [1964] AC 210. (188) [1989] AC 971. (189) R v Peters (1998) 192 CLR 493. (190) The dishonesty attaches to the obtaining, not the deception: R v Salvo [1980] VR 401; R v Love (1989) 17 NSWLR (191) Lanham, above n......
  • SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2007: “AUSTRALIA’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMMON LAW”
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...Frankland v The Queen [1987] AC 577. 12 [1999] 1 AC 82 at 90. 13 [1982] QB 1053. 14 [2002] 2 AC 164 at 171—175. 15 Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493. 16 Macleod v The Queen (2003) 214 CLR 230. 17 (2007) 81 ALJR 1107. 18 (1874) LRA Ch App 244 at 251—252. 19 (2007) 81 ALJR 1107 at 1147, [......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT