Petrotimor Companhia De Petroleos S.A.R.L. v Commonwealth

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2003
Neutral Citation[2003] FCAFC 3
Date2003
Year2003
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 cases
  • Habib v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Hicks v Ruddock
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Habib v Australia [Australia, Federal Court]
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 25 February 2010
    ...Australia Pty Ltd (Spycatcher case)UNK(1988) 165 CLR 30; 78 ALR 449; Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos SARL v. CommonwealthUNK(2003) 126 FCR 354; 197 ALR 461; [2003] FCAFC 3.6. Judicial consideration of the doctrine in Australia has been limited and conceptions of it in this country draw up......
  • Davis v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 23 November 2021
    ...590 O’Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210 Osborn v Parole Board [2013] UKSC 61 Petrotimor v Companhia de Petroleos SARL v Commonwealth [2003] FCAFC 3; 126 FCR 354 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 41; 243 CLR 319 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protecti......
  • Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
  • National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 April 2009
    ...Indonesia in 1971 and 1972 (when Timor-Leste was still a Portuguese colony): see Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos SARL v Commonwealth (2003) 126 FCR 354, 380 (Beaumont (2) This comprises more than six decisions, including Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (2005) 2......
  • Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...110 FCR 491, 501–4 (Black CJ dissenting). 11 Ibid 540–1, 545–6 (French J); cf Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos SARL v Commonwealth [2003] FCAFC 3 [28] (Black CJ and Hill J), in relation to the question whether statute had displaced the non-statutory executive power to define the territoria......
  • Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-3, September 2022
    • 1 September 2022
    ...Acts (n 52) 264–67; CGU (n 13); Hobart International Airport (n 4).54. Petrotimor Companhia De Petroleos SARL v Commonwealth (2003) 126 FCR 354, 372 [63] (Black CJ and Hill J)(‘Petrotimor’).55. Century Metals & Mining NL v Yeomans (1989) 40 FCR 564, 587 (Fisher, Wilcox and Spender JJ).56. (......
  • Foreign states in Australian courts.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 29 No. 3, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 FCR 347, 371 (Gummow J). (4) Petrotimor Companhia de Petroleos SARL v Commonwealth (2003) 126 FCR 354 (5) FSIA s 24. (6) FSIA s 23; Vitascope Pty Ltd v Republic of Nauru (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Giles CJ Comm D, 29 Aug......
  • Get Started for Free