Phillips v R
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Court | High Court |
Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gummow,Kirby,Hayne,Heydon JJ |
Judgment Date | 01 March 2006 |
Neutral Citation | [2006] HCA 4,2006-0301 HCA A |
Date | 01 March 2006 |
Docket Number | B58/2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
34 cases
- Moloney v New Zealand
-
IMM v The Queen
...28 Heydon, ‘Is the Weight of Evidence Material to Its Admissibility?’, (2014) 26 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 219 at 235. 29 (2006) 225 CLR 303 at 323–324 [63]; [2006] HCA 30 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 at 302 [10]; [1999] HCA 37; R v Ellis (2003) 58 NSWLR 700 at 716–717......
-
BBH v The Queen
...to its admissibility.’ 63 In that limiting case, the evidence would be capable of proving nothing about any fact in issue. In Phillips v The Queen the Court observed that 64: ‘On one view, the problems presented by the tender of similar fact evidence are merely problems of relevance. On ano......
-
X v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
...Act 1978 (Q), ss 6, 10(3) (suppression of the names of juveniles and certain victims of sexual abuse). See Phillips v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 537 at 553 [81]–[87]; 224 ALR 216 at 77Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Jones (1985) 2 NSWLR 47 at 53, 58-59, referring to Russell v Russell (1976) 134 CL......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Assessing Significant Probative Value for the Purposes of Admitting Coincidence Evidence: DSJ v R; NS v R
...182 CLR 461 at 485, Mason CJ, Deane and Dawson JJ. In terms of the continuedapplication of the Pfennig test, see Phillips v The Queen [2006] HCA 4, (2006) 225 CLR 303 at [64]. 9 Hoch v The Queen [1988] HCA 50, (1988) 165 CLR 292 at 296, Mason CJ, Wilson and Gaudron JJ; BBH vThe Queen [2012]......
-
The legal structure of propensity evidence
...RvO’Keefe [2000] 1 Qd R 564, 573–4; RvWRC (2002) 130 A Crim R 89[27]–[29]. The HCA were critical of former (Phillips vThe Queen (2006) 225 CLR 303 [60], [64]) but approving of latter:BBH vThe Queen (2012) 245 CLR 499 [155]–[159]; HML, n. 32 at [27], [285].164. For example, RvW[1998] 2 Qd R ......
-
Noticeboard
...the accused hadgiven evidence denying the charge.234 E & PNOTICEBOARD Similar fact evidence—AustraliaThe appellant in Phillips vThe Queen [2006] HCA 4 faced eight counts of sexualassault and rape against six female teenagers. Identity was not an issue. Theoffences against five of the compla......