Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeMURPHY J
Judgment Date10 October 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 1662
CourtFederal Court
Date10 October 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Boost Tel Pty Ltd v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 14 Marzo 2023
    ...117; 272 ALR 487 Pepsico Australia Pty Ltd v Kettle Chip Co Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 48; 135 ALR 192 Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd [2019] FCA 1662; 375 ALR 251 Polo Textile Industries Pty Ltd v Domestic Textile Corporation Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 265; 42 FCR 227 Registrar of Trade Marks v Wool......
  • RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Henkel Australia Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 Septiembre 2021
    ...goods of other traders, the display of the mark in advertising will be use as a trade mark: Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited (2019) 375 ALR 251; [2019] FCA 1662 at [171] (Murphy J), quoting Anheuser-Busch, Inc v Budĕjovický Budvar, Národní Podnik (2002) 56 IPR 182; [2002] FCA 390 (......
  • Enagic Co Ltd v Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 2 Diciembre 2021
    ...(2006) 219 FCR 585 Pham Global Pty Ltd v Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd (2017) 251 FCR 379 Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited [2019] FCA 1662; 375 ALR 251 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company [2019] FCA 923;......
  • RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Henkel Australia Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 6 Septiembre 2022
    ...279 Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (2014) 106 IPR 291 Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd (2019) 148 IPR 211 Pioneer Kabushiki Kaisha v Registrar of Trade Marks (1977) 137 CLR 670 Puxu Pty Ltd v Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd (1980) 31 A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • High Court's BOTOX Decision Highlights A Need For Reform
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 5 Mayo 2023
    ...decision, the case in which this difference might have most clearly presented itself is Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited [2019] FCA 1662. In that case, Murphy J postulated the concept of a "style name", being something different from a trade mark because it is, according to the jud......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT