Pioneer Express Pty Ltd v Hotchkiss

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1958] HCA 45,1958-1020 HCA A
Date1958
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 cases
  • Kruger v Commonwealth; Bray v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Higgins v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Felton v Mullingan
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Agtrack (Nt) Pty Ltd v Hatfield
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 August 2005
    ...pleadings (if any) and to the factual basis of each claim.’ 30 Not all proceedings will be civil in nature. The appellants in Pioneer Express Pty Ltd v Hotchkiss25 had been convicted in a Court of Petty Sessions, on information laid under State law. Hume v Palmer26 was an earlier example. A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Constitutional Implications from Representative Democracy
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 23-1, March 1995
    • 1 March 1995
    ...92 US 542 (1876)at552.141(1912) 16 CLR 99 at 108-109perGriffithCJ,at109-110perBartonJ;see alsoPioneerExpressPtyLtdvHotchkiss(1958) 101 CLR 536 at 550perDixonCJ,at560perTaylprJ,at566perMenziesJ.'Nationwide (1992) 177 CLR 1at 60perBrennanJ,at73-74perDeaneandTooheyJJ;PoliticalAdvertising (1992......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT