Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Date2003
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
859 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • What's News In Construction & Infrastructure? - 6 November 2013
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 13 November 2013
    ...57, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597, cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, cited Queensland Building Services Authority v Lazinski......
  • Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales: The Demise of State Privative Clauses
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 April 2010
    ...error. Ever since the High Court dismembered privative clauses at the Federal level in Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2001) 211 CLR 476, there has been speculation that it might do the same for State privative clauses in their application to State Supreme Courts. It did so......
85 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...CJ and Deane J); Kartinyeri v Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337, 384 [97] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, 492 [29] (Gleeson CJ); Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1, 8-9 [19]-[20] (Gleeson CJ), 66-7 [225] (Kirby (138) R v Ambo (2011) 13 DCLR (NSW) 22......
  • 'An "alien" by the barest of threads' - the legality of the deportation of long-term residents from Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 2, August 2009
    • 1 August 2009
    ...1 and other cases are discussed. (356) Migration Act ss 474(1)-(2). (357) See Migration Act s 474; Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476. The Ombudsman notes that, '[h]istorically, the majority of s 501 decisions have been made by the Minister': Commonwealth Ombudsman, above......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...construction of privative clauses in this way has been familiar in the federal sphere at least since Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 ('Plaintiff S157'). Kirk is not so much about giving a strained construction as extending the federal principle to the state sphere. 58 ......
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...Ltd v Liquor Licensing Court (2009) 237 CLR 501, 544 (Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan and Kiefel JJ). 79 (2010) 239 CLR 531 (‘Kirk’). 80 (2003) 211 CLR 476. 81 (2011) 243 CLR 181. 82 Grollo v Palmer (1995) 184 CLR 348; Hilton v Wells (1985) 157 CLR 57; Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal and To......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT