Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Date | 2003 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
859 cases
2 firm's commentaries
-
What's News In Construction & Infrastructure? - 6 November 2013
...57, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597, cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, cited Queensland Building Services Authority v Lazinski......
-
Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales: The Demise of State Privative Clauses
...error. Ever since the High Court dismembered privative clauses at the Federal level in Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2001) 211 CLR 476, there has been speculation that it might do the same for State privative clauses in their application to State Supreme Courts. It did so......
85 books & journal articles
-
Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
...CJ and Deane J); Kartinyeri v Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337, 384 [97] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, 492 [29] (Gleeson CJ); Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1, 8-9 [19]-[20] (Gleeson CJ), 66-7 [225] (Kirby (138) R v Ambo (2011) 13 DCLR (NSW) 22......
-
'An "alien" by the barest of threads' - the legality of the deportation of long-term residents from Australia.
...1 and other cases are discussed. (356) Migration Act ss 474(1)-(2). (357) See Migration Act s 474; Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476. The Ombudsman notes that, '[h]istorically, the majority of s 501 decisions have been made by the Minister': Commonwealth Ombudsman, above......
-
Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
...construction of privative clauses in this way has been familiar in the federal sphere at least since Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 ('Plaintiff S157'). Kirk is not so much about giving a strained construction as extending the federal principle to the state sphere. 58 ......
-
The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
...Ltd v Liquor Licensing Court (2009) 237 CLR 501, 544 (Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan and Kiefel JJ). 79 (2010) 239 CLR 531 (‘Kirk’). 80 (2003) 211 CLR 476. 81 (2011) 243 CLR 181. 82 Grollo v Palmer (1995) 184 CLR 348; Hilton v Wells (1985) 157 CLR 57; Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal and To......
Request a trial to view additional results