Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Date | 2003 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
862 cases
- Telstra Corporation Ltd v Accc (No 2)
-
Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Ltd
...not be followed. 57 It should be added that, with respect to the remedy of injunction, what was said in the joint reasons in Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth58 indicates that injunctive relief clearly is ‘available for fraud, bribery, dishonesty or other improper purpose’. 58 However,......
- A99 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
- Martinez v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
What's News In Construction & Infrastructure? - 6 November 2013
...57, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597, cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, cited Queensland Building Services Authority v Lazinski......
-
Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales: The Demise of State Privative Clauses
...error. Ever since the High Court dismembered privative clauses at the Federal level in Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2001) 211 CLR 476, there has been speculation that it might do the same for State privative clauses in their application to State Supreme Courts. It did so......
85 books & journal articles
-
Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
...CJ and Deane J); Kartinyeri v Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337, 384 [97] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, 492 [29] (Gleeson CJ); Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1, 8-9 [19]-[20] (Gleeson CJ), 66-7 [225] (Kirby (138) R v Ambo (2011) 13 DCLR (NSW) 22......
-
'An "alien" by the barest of threads' - the legality of the deportation of long-term residents from Australia.
...1 and other cases are discussed. (356) Migration Act ss 474(1)-(2). (357) See Migration Act s 474; Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476. The Ombudsman notes that, '[h]istorically, the majority of s 501 decisions have been made by the Minister': Commonwealth Ombudsman, above......
-
The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
...for his comments on an earlier draft and Clara and Selena Bateman for their editorial assistance. 1 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, 513 (Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ) ('S157'); Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2007) 228 C......
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...68 Cf, in relation to the rule of law, Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, 513 [103] (Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ): s 75(v) constitutes a 'textual reinforcement' of the underlying assumption of the rule of law. 69 This seems consonant with comments in ......
Get Started for Free