Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judge | French CJ,Hayne,Kiefel,Bell,Gageler,Keane JJ |
| Judgment Date | 11 February 2015 |
| Neutral Citation | [2015] HCA 3 |
| Date | 11 February 2015 |
| Docket Number | S297/2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Minister for Home Affairs v Brown
...and Border Protection [2014] HCA 22; 254 CLR 28 at [40]; see also Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 3; 255 CLR 231 at [18]-[19]. The issue of “national interest” therefore provides very limited scope for judicial review. But it is still an addit......
-
Stambe v Minister for Health (No 2)
...in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), a similar approach was taken in Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 3; 255 CLR 231 at [32]. 27 In earlier decisions, I have observed that caution needs to be exercised about the use of consequentialist reasoning in......
-
Commonwealth of Australia v MZZHL
...the hedging duties imposed upon it, as French J observed [in Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 3; 255 CLR 231], the remedy of mandamus is available to compel the proper performance of those duties. It is precisely because the hedging duties may ......
-
FUD18 v Minister for Home Affairs
...issues, the effect will be as set out by the High Court in Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] HCA 3; (2015) 255 CLR 231. In that case, in response to a writ of mandamus, the Minister made a return to the writ certifying that he had done what w......