Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1981] HCA 45,1981-0901 HCA B |
| Date | 1981 |
| Year | 1981 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
755 cases
-
Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls
...to the application of doctrines of preclusion and, in particular, an extension of that species of preclusion dealt with in Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd65. 95 Lindgren AJA described the abuse differently. He identified 66 it as being the enforcement of the orders obtained at ......
- Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland
- Re St Leon; ex parte National Australiabank Ltd
- Re Zakrzewski; Zakrzewski v Rodgers
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Claims in contract and estoppel: The jurisdiction of the NSW Land and Environment Court
...that Wilson could not now seek to rely upon those alleged rights, pursuant to the judgment in Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun (1981) 147 CLR 589. In rejecting the Council's claim, the Court noted Wilson had not previously sought to enlarge, intensify, alter, rebuild or change (Alterati......
-
'Anshun' estoppel - the risks of waiting
...the supplier. But is it too late? Have you lost the opportunity to pursue your claim? In Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45, the High Court laid down the principles which came to be known as "Anshun estoppel". In essence, a party can be prevented from making claims w......
-
Fair suck of the sauce bottle: Can a builder be sued twice for the same defects?
...(faulty) crane had been hired from the Port of Melbourne Authority by the worker's employer. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45 The earlier case with Sotareles' claim for personal injury compensation for an accident caused by crane equipment hired by Anshun from the ......
4 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...(1843) 3 Hare 100 at 114–115, per Sir James Wigram V-C [67 ER 313 at 319]. See also Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 at 602–603, per Gibbs CJ, Mason and Aickin JJ; Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd [1995] QB 137 at 147, per Stuart-Smith LJ; Hamlin v Edwin Evans (1......
-
Conclusion : reconceptualising the maritime lien and the conflict of laws
...v Milotin (1957) 97 CLR 465 at 474; and Zakrzewski, op cit n 101, at 50. See, however, Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 for a discussion of the other meanings of the term cause of action.257 Fielder v Ohio Edison Co 109 NE 2d 855 (1952). See also Maher, op cit......
-
THE APPLICATION OF THE
HENDERSON V HENDERSON
RULE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
...5 HKLRD 1. 4Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd v Kawal Teliti Sdn Bhd[1995] 3 MLJ 189. 5Port of Melbourne Authority v Ashnun Pty Ltd(1981) 147 CLR 589. 6Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Bhanabhai[2007] 2 NZLR 478. 7 Filip De Ly & Audley Sheppard, “ILA Recommendations on Lis Pendens and Res Jud......
-
Which estoppel in the law of Saint Lucia?
...35 Colin Howard, "Issue Estoppel and Autrefois Acquit" (1964) 27 M.L.R. 361. 36 Port o f Melbourne Authority v. Ashua Pty. Ltd. (1981) 147 C.L.R. 589 at p .602; Chamberlin v. Deputy Commissioner o f Taxation (1987) 164 C.L.R. 502. 37 Gertrude Wasserman, "The Doctrine of Fins De Non-Recevoir......