Postiglione v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1997] HCA 26,1997-0724 HCA A
Date1997
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
636 cases
  • Green v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 d2 Dezembro d2 2011
    ...punishment of ‘co-offenders’, albeit the limits of that term have not been defined with precision. 30 In Lowe v The Queen46 and in Postiglione v the Queen47, this Court was concerned with the application of the parity principle to persons charged with the same offences arising out of the sa......
  • Salasch v R
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Accc v Abb Transmission and Distribution Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • DPP v Daly
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 20 d4 Outubro d4 2011
    ...2004/16/3598 2004 IECCA 45 LOWE v R 154 CLR 606 1984 HCA 46 R v TISALANDIS 1982 2 NSWLR 430 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1993 S2 POSTIGLIONE v R 189 CLR 295 145 ALR 408 1997 HCA 26 R v MACGOWAN 1986 42 SASR 580 R v DJUKIC UNREP 13.12.2001 2001 VSCA 226 R v KAIROUZ UNREP 2005 NSWCCA 247 R v ROBSON &......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Parity in sentencing
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 d3 Setembro d3 2021
    ...ensure that there is not disparity between the sentences: Dwayhi v R (2011) 205 A Crim R 274 at [44]-[45] and Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295. The allowance of the same judicial officer to sentence the co-offenders permits the judicial officer to "consider the interrelationship b......
  • Parity in sentencing
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 d3 Setembro d3 2021
    ...ensure that there is not disparity between the sentences: Dwayhi v R (2011) 205 A Crim R 274 at [44]-[45] and Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295. The allowance of the same judicial officer to sentence the co-offenders permits the judicial officer to "consider the interrelationship b......
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Forensic Investigations and Miscarriages of Justice. The Rhetoric Meets The Reality Part Three
    • 15 d2 Junho d2 2010
    ...Re, 2009 ONCA 202 .............................................................................. 109, 121 Postiglione v. he Queen, [1997] HCA 26 ..................................................................... 139 Preece v. Her Majesty’s Advocate, [1981] Crim. L.R. 783 ......................
  • The Paradox of Parity in Sentencing in Australia: The Pursuit of Equal Justice That Highlights the Futility of Consistency in Sentencing
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 77-5, October 2013
    • 1 d2 Outubro d2 2013
    ...CLR 606 at 609. See also Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606,[1984] HCA 46; Mason J at 611–14; Dawson J at 623; Postiglione v The Queen(1997) 189 CLR 295, [1997] HCA 26; Nguyen vWestern Australia [2009] WASCA81.4 (1984) 154 CLR 606 at 609. For a general overview of the principle, seeG. Mack......
  • Lessons lost in sentencing: welding individualised justice to indigenous justice.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 39 No. 1, August - August 2015
    • 1 d6 Agosto d6 2015
    ...justice, see generally United States v Frank (1998) 8 F Supp 2d 253, 264, 269 (Cote DCJ) (SD NY, 1998). (24) Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295, 301 (Dawson and Gaudron JJ) (emphasis added), citing Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606, 610-11 (Mason (25) Matters pertaining to Indigen......
  • EQUAL CONSIDERATION AND INFORMED IMAGINING: RECOGNISING AND RESPONDING TO THE LIVED EXPERIENCES OF ABUSED WOMEN WHO KILL.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 3, April 2018
    • 1 d0 Abril d0 2018
    ...South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v South Africa) (Second Phase) [1966] ICJ Rep 7, 305 (Judge Tanaka). (19) Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295, 301 (Dawson and Gaudron JJ). 'Equal justice requires that like should be treated alike but that, if there are relevant differences, due all......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT