Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
JudgeMCKERRACHER J
Judgment Date10 June 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 808
Date10 June 2020
Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] FCA 808

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] FCA 808


File number:

WAD 519 of 2018



Judge:

MCKERRACHER J



Date of judgment:

10 June 2020



Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of a decision of the Registrar of the National Native Title Tribunal – application to review the decision to register six indigenous land use agreements – whether applicant denied procedural fairness – where applicant did not object to registration pursuant to s 24CI of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – Consideration of Div 3 Subdiv C of Pt 2 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for dismissal of the claim pursuant to s 31A of the Federal Court Act of Australia 1976 (Cth) and r 26.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether claim enjoyed reasonable prospects of success – whether claim disclosed a reasonable cause of action



Legislation:

Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 3(1), 16(1)

Constitution s 51(xxvi)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 20(1A), 31A(2), 31A(3)

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 24CH, 24CH(l)(a), 24CH(l)(b), 24CH(2), 24CI(1), 24CJ, 24CK, 24CK(2)(c), 24CK(4), 199A, 203BE(5), 203BE(5)(a), 203BE(5)(b)

Native Title (Notices) Determination 2011 (No. 1) (Cth) ss 4, 6(1), 6(2)(a)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 16.21(1)(e), 26.01, 26.01(1)(a), 26.01(1)(b), 26.01(1)(c), 26.01(1)(d), 31.01

Pacific Islanders Protection Act 1875 (UK) ss 6, 7



Cases cited:

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (2013) 220 FCR 256; [2013] FCA 641

Bennell v Western Australia (2006) 153 FCR 120; [2006] FCA 1243

Bodney v Bennell (2008) 167 FCR 84; [2008] FCAFC 63

Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation v Onslow Salt Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 978

Chaffers v Goldsmid [1894] 1 QB 186

Coe v Commonwealth (1979) 24 ALR 118; [1979] HCA 68

Coe v Commonwealth (1993) 118 ALR 193; [1993] HCA 42

Crocker v Toys ‘R’ Us (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 728

Dandaven v Harbeth Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 955

Davey v Bentinck [1893] 1 QB 185

Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62

Dowling v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (2007) 169 IR 201; [2007] FMCA 2104

General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125

Geneva Laboratories Ltd v Nguyen (2014) 110 IPR 295; [2014] FCA 1270

Hodson v Pare [1899] 1 QB 455

Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd (2008) 167 FCR 372; [2008] FCAFC 60

Kimber v Owners Strata Plan No 48216 [2016] FCA 1090

Love v Commonwealth of Australia; Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] HCA 3

Luck v University of Southern Queensland [2008] FCA 1582

Mabo v Queensland (No.2) (1992) 175 CLR 1

McAleer v University of Western Australia (No 3) (2008) 171 FCR 499; [2008] FCA 1490

MCG Quarries Pty Ltd v Beach [2017] FCA 1601

McGlade v South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Aboriginal Corporation (No 2) (2019) 374 ALR 329; [2019] FCAFC 238

Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (2015) 256 CLR 326

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57

Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273

NBGZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 143 FCR 434; [2005] FCAFC 119

Norman v Matthews (1916) 85 LJKB 857

Pickering v Centrelink [2008] FCA 561

Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2012) 203 FCR 325; [2012] FCAFC 97

Qualify Me Pty Ltd v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 192

Rana v Commonwealth [2013] FCA 189

Rogers v Assets Loan Co Pty Ltd (2008) 250 ALR 82; [2008] FCA 1305

Sam Hawk” v Reiter Petroleum Inc (2016) 246 FCR 337; [2016] FCAFC 26

Singh v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (2011) 282 ALR 56; [2011] FCA 883

SK Foods LP v SK Foods Australia (in liq) (No 3) (2013) 214 FCR 543; [2013] FCA 526

SmithKline Beecham (Aust) Pty Ltd v Chipman [2002] FCA 674

Spencer v Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118

Sullivan v North West Crewing Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1130

Von Reisner v Commonwealth (2009) 177 FCR 531; [2009] FCAFC 97

Walker v South Australia (No 2) (2015) 215 FCR 254; [2013] FCA 700

Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378

Wenlock v Moloney [1965] 2 All ER 871

Western Australia v Commonwealth (1995) 183 CLR 373

Williams & Humbert v W & H Trade Marks [1986] 1 All ER 129

Winters v Fogarty [2017] FCA 51



Date of hearing:

30 March 2020



Registry:

Western Australia



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

73



Counsel for the Applicant:

Ms L Minston (appeared with leave on behalf of Mr Prior)



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr G Del Villar QC



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Clayton Utz



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr A Sefton



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

State Solicitor’s Office



Counsel for the Third Respondent:

Mr M Pudovskis



Solicitor for the Third Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Counsel for the Fourth Respondent:

The Fourth Respondent submits to any order of the Court, save as to the question of costs



ORDERS


WAD 519 of 2018

BETWEEN:

SHELDON PRIOR

Applicant


AND:

SOUTH WEST ABORIGINAL LAND & SEA COUNCIL ABORIGINAL CORPORATION

First Respondent


STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Second Respondent


COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (and another named in the Schedule)

Third Respondent



JUDGE:

MCKERRACHER J

DATE OF ORDER:

10 June 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The applicant’s application be summarily dismissed.

  2. The applicant pay the costs of each of the respondents, to be assessed if not agreed.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.




REASONS FOR...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • Matson v Attorney-General (Cth)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 March 2021
    ...Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] FCA 808 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 Rahardja v The Governor, Long Bay Gaol [2002] NSWSC 1253 Rivera v Minister for Justice and Customs [2007] FCAFC ......
  • Tucker v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 22 November 2022
    ...FCR 164 Plaintiff M83A/2019 v Morrison (No 2) [2020] FCA 1198 Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] FCA 808 Saunders on behalf of the Bigambul People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2021] FCA 190 Ship “Sam Hawk” v Reiter Petroleum Inc [2016] FCAFC 26......
  • AC (deceased) v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 July 2021
    ...Corporation (No 2) [2019] FCAFC 238; (2019) 374 ALR 329 Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] FCA 808 QGC Pty Ltd v Bygrave [2011] FCA 1457; (2011) 199 FCR 94 Spencer v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28; (2010) 241 CLR 118 Yarran v South West Aboriginal L......
  • Bennell v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 December 2021
    ...Nelson v Northern Territory [2010] FCA 1343; (2010) 190 FCR 344 Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] FCA 808 Yarran v South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] HCATrans 202 Division: General Division Registry: Western ......
  • Get Started for Free