Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date06 April 2023
Neutral Citation[2023] FCAFC 54
Date06 April 2023
Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2023] FCAFC 54

Federal Court of Australia


Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2023] FCAFC 54

Appeal from:



File number(s):


NSD 887 of 2021NSD 895 of 2021



Judgment of:

WIGNEY, O’BRYAN AND DOWNES JJ



Date of judgment:

6 April 2023



Catchwords:

CONSUMER LAW – unconscionable conduct – statutory unconscionability under s 21 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) – registered training organisation provided vocational education and training under Commonwealth’s Vocational Education and Training Fee Higher Education Loan Program (VFH scheme) – whether certain changes made by the registered training organisation to the student enrolment process, and the claiming and retaining of revenue in respect of enrolments under the VFH scheme, constituted unconscionable conduct – whether a senior executive of the registered training organisation was knowingly concerned in, or party to, the alleged contraventions of the registered training organisation for the purpose of ss 224, 246 and 248 of the ACL – whether conduct of sales and marketing agents of the registered training organisation undertaken in contravention of ss 18, 21 or 29 of the ACL can be taken to have been engaged in by the registered training organisation within the meaning of s 139B(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – whether conduct of registered training organisation was not unconscionable by reason that the organisation promptly remedied harm that was caused by conduct that would otherwise have been characterised as unconscionable



Legislation:

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12CB, 12CC

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 139B, 155, Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) ss 2, 18, 20, 21, 22, 29, 69, 78, 79, 224, 246, 248

Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth)

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Pt IVB, ss 51AC, 51ACA, 51AD, 52A

Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Bill (No 2) 2010 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564

Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd (2018) 261 FCR 301

Ashbury v Reid [1961] WAR 49

Attorney General of New South Wales v World Best Holdings Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 557

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2017) 254 FCR 68

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 1982

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v BlueScope Limited (No 5) [2022] FCA 1475

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cornerstone Investment Aust Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2018] FCA 1408

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Danoz Direct Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 881; 60 IPR 296

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1427; 236 ALR 665

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v EnergyAustralia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 274

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd [2013] FCAFC 90; ATPR 42-447

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Limited [2023] FCAFC 45

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Medibank Private Ltd (2018) 267 FCR 544

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) (No 3) [2021] FCA 737; 154 ACSR 472

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) (No 4) [2021] FCA 752

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) (No 5) [2021] FCA 919

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Quantum Housing Group Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 40; 388 ALR 577

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Rural Press Ltd [2001] FCA 116; ATPR 41-804

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TF Woollam & Son Pty Ltd (2011) 196 FCR 212

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Phoenix Institute of Australia Pty Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) [2021] FCA 956

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Quantum Housing Group Pty Ltd (2021) 285 FCR 133

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt (2019) 267 CLR 1

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Maxwell [2006] NSWSC 1052; 59 ACSR 373

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd (2005) 148 FCR 132

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 3) [2018] FCA 1701; 131 ACSR 585

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (Omnibus) [2022] FCA 515; 159 ACSR 381

Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424

Coggin v Telstar Finance Company (Q) Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 191; ASAL 55-156

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Kojic (2016) 249 FCR 421

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118

Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473

Good Living Company Pty Ltd v Kingsmede Pty Ltd (2021) 284 FCR 424

Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) (1953) 90 CLR 113

Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392

Keller v LED Technologies Pty Ltd (2010) 185 FCR 449

Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2006) 154 IR 228

McGrath v HNSW Pty Ltd (2014) 219 FCR 489

Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy (2003) 135 FCR 1

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2015) 236 FCR 199

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525

Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Burniston (No 2) [2012] WASC 383; 271 FLR 122

Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Xiao [2015] VSC 21

Quinlivan v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2004) 160 FCR 1

R v Nifadopoulos (1988) 36 A Crim R 137

R v Tannous (1987) 10 NSWLR 303

Rafferty v Madgwicks (2012) 203 FCR 1

Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 118 FCR 236

Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53

Stefanovski v Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 31; 368 ALR 607

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 6; 399 ALR 409

Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389; 15 BPR 29,699

Unique International College Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2018) 266 FCR 631

Wade v J Daniels and Associates Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1708

Western Australia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1

Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661

Xiamen Huadian Switchgear Co Ltd v Powins Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1159; 169 IPR 77

The Juliana (1822) 2 Dods 504; 165 ER 1560



Division:



Registry:

New South Wales

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex