Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1998-0428 HCA A,[1998] HCA 28
Date1998
Year1998
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1731 cases
14 firm's commentaries
  • What's News In Construction & Infrastructure? - 6 November 2013
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 13 November 2013
    ...CLR 597, cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, cited Queensland Building Services Authority v Lazinski [2009] QDC 381, cited Secretary, Department of Social Security v Alvaro (1994) 50 ......
  • Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 22 May 2013
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 3 June 2013
    ...of an Act - Conflict resolved by application of statutory construction principles - Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 at [69]- [71] considered and applied. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist a......
  • Recap of recent developments in NSW compulsory acquisition law
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 November 2019
    ...the approved form for the PAN. The Court of Appeal's decision (anchored closely with Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28) was that the Just Terms Act was intended to establish procedural requirements for compulsory acquisitions, rather than act as a protection......
  • Victorian Government Bulletin - In the media, Practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 June 2020
    ...within time - appeal dismissed - R v A2 [2019] HCA 35; (2019) 93 ALJR 1106; Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Statute Update (Regulations References) Bill 2020 Finally passed both Houses 27/02/2020 - Amends 10 Acts to: replace references to specific......
  • Get Started for Free
48 books & journal articles
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...which the Australian High Court considered had outlived its usefulness in Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority(1998) 194 CLR 355. The preferred approach was not to engage in formal distinctions but to ask the question, as expressed by Lord Steyn in R v Soneji[2006] 1 AC 340,......
  • Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...apply in an Act which grants no rights of appeal. 155 A path anticipated in Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, 374–5 [41] (Brennan CJ), 388–9 [91] (McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ). 156 Peter Cane and Leighton McDonald, Principles of Administrati......
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...(1999) 211, cited in Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 46 (McHugh J). 114 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, 381 [69] (McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ). Indeed the 'purpose' of the law so identified might conceivably be quite different from t......
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...last resort where no other solution can be found: ibid 361. 77 See generally Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355. 78 Cases such as Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd v Freeland (1983) 79 FLR 183, Community and Public Sector Union v Woodward (1997) 76 FCR 551 and ......
  • Get Started for Free