Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1998-0428 HCA A,[1998] HCA 28
Date1998
Year1998
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1696 cases
19 firm's commentaries
  • What's News In Construction & Infrastructure? - 6 November 2013
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 13 November 2013
    ...CLR 597, cited Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, cited Queensland Building Services Authority v Lazinski [2009] QDC 381, cited Secretary, Department of Social Security v Alvaro (1994) 50 ......
  • Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 22 May 2013
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 3 June 2013
    ...of an Act - Conflict resolved by application of statutory construction principles - Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 at [69]- [71] considered and applied. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist a......
  • Recap of recent developments in NSW compulsory acquisition law
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 November 2019
    ...the approved form for the PAN. The Court of Appeal's decision (anchored closely with Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28) was that the Just Terms Act was intended to establish procedural requirements for compulsory acquisitions, rather than act as a protection......
  • Victorian Government Bulletin - In the media, Practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 June 2020
    ...within time - appeal dismissed - R v A2 [2019] HCA 35; (2019) 93 ALJR 1106; Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Statute Update (Regulations References) Bill 2020 Finally passed both Houses 27/02/2020 - Amends 10 Acts to: replace references to specific......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
52 books & journal articles
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...174; [1933] HCA 2. 96 (2014) 252 CLR 307, [11]-[25]; [2014] HCA 2. 97 Project Blue Sky (W’gong) Pty Ltd v ABA (1998) 194 CLR 355, [69]; [1998] HCA 28. 98 Commissioner of Railways (NSW) v Agalianos (1955) 92 CLR 39, 397 per Dixon CJ; [1955] HCA 27; Klein v Domus (1963) 109 CLR 467, 473 per D......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...which the Australian High Court considered had outlived its usefulness in Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority(1998) 194 CLR 355. The preferred approach was not to engage in formal distinctions but to ask the question, as expressed by Lord Steyn in R v Soneji[2006] 1 AC 340,......
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...last resort where no other solution can be found: ibid 361. 77 See generally Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355. 78 Cases such as Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd v Freeland (1983) 79 FLR 183, Community and Public Sector Union v Woodward (1997) 76 FCR 551 and ......
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...Deane, Toohey, Gaudron and McHugh JJ). 44 Kirk (2010) 239 CLR 531, 574 (French CJ, Gummow, Hayen, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ). 45 (1998) 194 CLR 355 ('Project Blue Sky'). 46 (1998) 194 CLR 355 390–1 (McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ) ('Project Blue Sky'). 47 See, eg, Craig (1995) 184 CLR......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT