Prowse v Mcintyre
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1961-1205 HCA A,[1961] HCA 79 |
| Year | 1961 |
| Date | 1961 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
- Forster v Jododex Aust Pty Ltd
-
Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
...152 Joint reasons at [28]–[29]. 153 See, esp, Newcastle City Council (2005) 43 MVR 381 at 383 [9]. 154 Section 7. 155Prowse v McIntyre (1961) 111 CLR 264. 156 The 1969 Act, s 157 The 1969 Act, s 52(1)(d). 158 The 1969 Act, s 52(1)(e)(i). 159 Section 51(2), inserted by the Limitation (Amendm......
- Skyworld Development Sdn Bhd v Zalam Corporation Sdn Bhd & Other Cases
-
Euronav N.v v. Repsol Trading S.A.
...the offence was held to have occurred on 1 January because it was already that date at the place of the offence. 34 Prowse v McIntyre [1961] HCA 79, a decision of the High Court of Australia, concerned a limitation period for a personal injury claim. A statute postponed the limitation perio......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Beware the ticking adjudication clock - At least for the moment...
...claims that are under assessment in meetings or informal correspondence. Footnotes 1(1988) 24 FCR 512. 2[2009] WASAT 133, [59]. 3(1961) 111 CLR 264, The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specif......