Pt Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Accc

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date2011
Neutral Citation[2011] FCAFC 52
Date2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • PT Garuda Indonesia v ACCC [Australia, High Court.]
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 September 2012
    ...[2010] FCA 551. 3PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v. Australian Competition and Consumer CommissionUNK(2011) 192 FCR 393; 277 ALR 67; 83 ACSR 35; [2011] FCAFC 52. 4Restatement of the Law: the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, 3d, 1986, Vol. 1, Ch 5, Sub-Ch 5[1983] 1 AC 244 at 262; [1981] 2......
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 May 2019
    ...means by which Indonesia carried on the business of an airline: PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52; 192 FCR 393 (‘FC1’) at 430 [170] per Rares J (Lander and Greenwood JJ agreeing at 404 [49]). Secondly, purely commercial conduct, such as......
  • Pt Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Accc
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 September 2012
  • PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 May 2020
    ...of s 3(1) of the Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth): PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52; 192 FCR 393. In that case, Rares J (with whom Lander and Greenwood JJ agreed at [49]) said (at [169] – [171]):169 Here, however, it is difficu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Investor-State Arbitration 2019: the international comparative legal guide
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 November 2018
    ...The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia considered the definition of separate entity in PT Garuda Indonesia v ACCC [2011] FCAFC 52. It was held that an instrumentality is a body created by the State for the purpose of performing a function for the Therefore, a separate entity will ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT