Pt Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Accc
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
| Judgment Date | 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] FCAFC 52 |
| Date | 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
PT Garuda Indonesia v ACCC [Australia, High Court.]
...[2010] FCA 551. 3PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v. Australian Competition and Consumer CommissionUNK(2011) 192 FCR 393; 277 ALR 67; 83 ACSR 35; [2011] FCAFC 52. 4Restatement of the Law: the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, 3d, 1986, Vol. 1, Ch 5, Sub-Ch 5[1983] 1 AC 244 at 262; [1981] 2......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies)
...means by which Indonesia carried on the business of an airline: PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52; 192 FCR 393 (‘FC1’) at 430 [170] per Rares J (Lander and Greenwood JJ agreeing at 404 [49]). Secondly, purely commercial conduct, such as......
- Pt Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Accc
-
PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
...of s 3(1) of the Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth): PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52; 192 FCR 393. In that case, Rares J (with whom Lander and Greenwood JJ agreed at [49]) said (at [169] – [171]):169 Here, however, it is difficu......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Investor-State Arbitration 2019: the international comparative legal guide
...The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia considered the definition of separate entity in PT Garuda Indonesia v ACCC [2011] FCAFC 52. It was held that an instrumentality is a body created by the State for the purpose of performing a function for the Therefore, a separate entity will ......