Purdie on behalf of the Yurriyangem Taam Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeBANKS-SMITH J
Judgment Date23 May 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 696
CourtFederal Court
Date23 May 2019


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Purdie on behalf of the Yurriyangem Taam Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 696


File number:

WAD 44 of 2019



Judge:

BANKS-SMITH J



Date of judgment:

23 May 2019



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE - consent determination of native title - agreement of parties - s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)



Legislation:

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 55, 56, 57, 61, 62A, 64(1B), 66, 66B, 87, 87A, 94A, 109A, 190, 225

Native Title Amendment Act 2007 (Cth) [2.62]



Cases cited:

Attorney-General of the Northern Territory v Ward [2003] FCAFC 283; (2003) 134 FCR 16

Billy Patch and Others on behalf of the Birriliburu People v State of Western Australia [2008] FCA 944

Brooking on behalf of the Bunuba People (Bunuba #2) v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 1481

Brown (on behalf of the Ngarla People) v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 1025

Jessell on behalf of the Goorring Native Title Claimants v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 2047

Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474

Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; (2001) 115 FCR 109

Neowarra v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 1092

O'Connor on behalf of the Palyku People v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 330

Sharpe v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 599

Street on behalf of the Giniyjawarrni Yoowaniya Riwi Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 2019

Sturt on behalf of the Jaru Native Title Claim v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1923

Ward v State of Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848

Watson on behalf of the Nyikina Mangala People v State of Western Australia (No 6) [2014] FCA 545

Wurrunmurra v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1399



Date of hearing:

Determined on the papers



Registry:

Western Australia



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

59



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Ms J Toohey of the Kimberley Land Council



Solicitor for the State of Western Australia::

Ms S Begg of the State Solicitors Office



Solicitor for the Shire of Halls Creek:

Mr P Wittkuhn of McLeods



Solicitor for Sterling Jack Buntine:

Ms M Watt of M Watts Legal



Solicitor for Telstra Corporation Limited:

Mr SE Singleton of King & Wood Mallesons


ORDERS


WAD 44 of 2019

BETWEEN:

SHIRLEY PURDIE, KENNETH MARTIN, RITA MALAY, TREVOR BEDFORD, MAUREEN CARTER, RAYMOND WALKBIER, MAREEKA PATRICK, JEAN MALAY, REBECCA SAMPI, TIMOTHY MOSQUITO, IRA LANS

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, SHIRE OF HALLS CREEK, STERLING JACK BUNTINE, TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED

Respondent



JUDGE:

BANKS-SMITH J

DATE OF ORDER:

23 MAY 2019



THE COURT NOTES THAT:


A. Pursuant to s 87A(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) the parties have filed with the Court the attached Minute of Consent Determination of Native Title which reflects the terms of an agreement reached by the parties in relation to these proceedings.

B. The terms of the agreement involve the making of consent orders for a determination of native title in relation to the land and waters the subject of this proceeding pursuant to s 87A(4) and s 94A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

C. The pastoral respondent Sterling Jack Buntine has agreed to the terms of the Minute of Consent Determination of Native Title on the basis of having reached agreement with the Applicant in relation to N50413 Bedford Downs pastoral lease and those portions of N050504 Margaret River and N50414 Lansdowne pastoral leases that are situated within the Determination Area. Following the determination taking effect, the agreements will be executed and application will be made for the agreements to be registered as Indigenous Land Use Agreements on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements as a body corporate agreement pursuant to s 24BG of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).


In these circumstances and with the consent of the parties, the Court determines, declares and orders that:


THE COURT DECLARES AND ORDERS THAT:


1. It is satisfied that an order in the terms proposed in the attached Minute of Consent Determination of Native Title is within the power of the Court and is appropriate to be made pursuant to s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

2. There be a determination of native title in the terms of the Minute of Consent Determination of Native Title attached. The determination is to take effect immediately upon the making of a determination under s 56(1) or s 57(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) as the case may be.

3. Within twelve months of the date upon which these orders are made, a representative of the common law holders of the native title rights and interests shall indicate whether they intend to have the native title rights and interests held in trust and, if so, by whom. They are invited to do so by:

(a) nominating in writing to the Federal Court a prescribed body corporate to be trustee of the native title rights and interests; and

(b) including within the nomination the written consent of the body corporate.

4. If a prescribed body corporate is nominated in accordance with order 3, it will hold the native title rights and interests described in order 1 in trust for the common law holders of the native title rights and interests.

5. In the event that there is no nomination within the time specified in order 3, or such later time as the Court may order, the matter is to be listed for further directions.

6. There be no order as to costs


Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.



ATTACHMENT 'A' DETERMINATION THE COURT ORDERS, DECLARES AND DETERMINES THAT: Existence of native title (s 225)

1. The Determination Area is the land and waters described in Schedule 1 and depicted on the maps comprising Schedule 2.

2. Native title exists in those parts of the Determination Area identified in Schedules 3 and 4 (Native Title Area).

3. Native title does not exist in those parts of the Determination Area identified in Schedule 5.

Native title holders (s 225(a))

4. The native title in the Determination Area is held by the native title holders. The native title holders are the people referred to in Schedule 6.

The nature and extent of native title rights and interests (s 225(b)) and exclusiveness of native title (s 225(e))

Exclusive native title rights and interests

5. Subject to paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to each part of the Determination Area referred to in Schedule 3 (being areas where any extinguishment must be disregarded) is the right to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that part of the Determination Area as against the whole world.

Non-exclusive rights and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Drill on behalf of the Purnululu Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 22 October 2020
    ...Home Affairs [2019] HCA 17; 265 CLR 285 Purdie on behalf of the Yurriyangem Taam Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 696 Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404 Rubibi Community v Western Australia (No 7) [2006] FCA 459 Sagacious Legal Pty Ltd v We......
  • George on behalf of the Gkuthaarn and Kukatj People v State of Queensland
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 September 2020
    ...of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 10 Purdie on behalf of the Yurriyangem Taam Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 696 Tex on behalf of the Lappi Lappi and Ngulupi Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1591 Ward v State of Western Australia [20......
  • Minning on behalf of the Untiri Pulka Claim Group v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 27 July 2020
    ...of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 109 Purdie on behalf of the Yurriyangem Taam Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 696 Tex on behalf of the Lappi Lappi and Ngulupi Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1591 Ward v State of Western Australia [2......