Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants' Association of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date17 December 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCAFC 227
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Date17 December 2020
Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia [2020] FCAFC 227


Federal Court of Australia


Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia [2020] FCAFC 227

Appeal from:

Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants' Association of Australia (The JobKeeper Case) [2020] FCA 1365



File numbers:


NSD 1124 of 2020NSD 1125 of 2020



Judgment of:

JAGOT, BROMBERG AND WHEELAHAN JJ



Date of judgment:

17 December 2020



Catchwords:

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – appeal – Commonwealth JobKeeper Scheme – meaning of “the amounts payable to the employee in relation to the performance of work during the fortnight” – extrinsic material – consideration of note to section – text, context and purpose – appeal allowed



Legislation:

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB(1)

Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus (Measures No 2) Act 2020 (Cth)

Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020 (Cth) ss 7 and 20

Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Cth) rr 8 and 10(3)

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 144(1)(a)

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 323, 323(1), 789GA, 789GC, 789GD, 789GDA, 789GDA(2), 789GDA(2)(a), 789GDA(2)(b), 789GDB, 789GDC, 789GE, 789GF, 789GG and 789GQ

Commonwealth of Australia, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 8 April 2020, 2918-2922 (Josh Frydenberg, Treasurer)

Explanatory Memorandum, Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 (Cth) and Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus (Measures No 2) Bill 2020 (Cth)

Explanatory Statement, Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Cth)



Australian Concise Oxford Dictionary (5th ed as at 2009)

Macquarie Dictionary (5th ed as at 2009)



Cases cited:

Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers Australia v Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1960

Australian Education Union v Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development) (2015) 239 FCR 461

Bendigo Bank Ltd v Williams [2000] FCA 482; (2000) 98 FCR 377

Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1981] HCA 40; (1981) 150 CLR 1

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Bay Street Appeal) [2020] FCAFC 192

Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 36; (2013) 248 CLR 619

Elazac Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (1994) 53 FCR 86

Glass v Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Authority [1992] FCA 558; (1992) 38 FCR 534

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BFW20 [2020] FCAFC 121

Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2020] HCA 29; (2020) 381 ALR 601

Murrihy v Betezy.com.au Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 908

Spence v Queensland [2019] HCA 15; (2019) 93 ALJR 643

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84; (2020) 378 ALR 585



Division:

General Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Employment and Industrial Relations



Number of paragraphs:

118



Date of hearing:

9 November 2020



Counsel for the Appellants:

J Kirk SC with T Prince



Solicitor for the Appellants:

Ashurst Australia



Counsel for the Respondents (NSD 1124 of 2020 and

NSD 1125 of 2020):

M Gibian SC with P Boncardo



Solicitor for the Respondent

(NSD 1124 of 2020):

Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia



Solicitor for the First Respondent

(NSD 1125 of 2020):

Transport Workers’ Union of Australia



Solicitor for the Second Respondent

(NSD 1125 of 2020):

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union





Table of corrections




14 October 2021

In paragraph 33, a closed bracket has been inserted after the words “that may be paid”.



14 October 2021

In paragraph 67, the word “from” has been inserted after the words “copied over”.

ORDERS


NSD 1124 of 2020

BETWEEN:

QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901)

First Appellant


QF CABIN CREW AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED

(ACN 128 382 105)

Second Appellant


AND:

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS' ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA

Respondent



order made by:

JAGOT, BROMBERG AND WHEELAHAN JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

17 DECEMBER 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The appeal be allowed.

  2. The cross-appeal be dismissed.

  3. The declaration made on 13 October 2020 be set aside.

  4. The parties are to provide a proposed form of order which substitutes the declaration made on 13 October 2020 to give effect to these reasons within 14 days.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


ORDERS


NSD 1125 of 2020


BETWEEN:

QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901)

First Appellant


QANTAS GROUND SERVICES PTY LIMITED

Second Appellant


AND:

TRANSPORT WORKERS’ UNION OF AUSTRALIA

First Respondent


AUSTRALIAN MUNICIPAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, CLERICAL AND SERVICES UNION

Second Respondent


order made by:

JAGOT, BROMBERG AND WHEELAHAN JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

17 DECEMBER 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The appeal be allowed.

  2. The cross-appeal be dismissed.

  3. The declaration made on 13 October 2020 be set aside.

  4. The parties are to provide a proposed form of order which substitutes the declaration made on 13 October 2020 to give effect to these reasons within 14 days.



[Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.]


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

JAGOT AND WHEELAHAN JJ:

Introduction
  1. This appeal concerns the meaning to be given to a provision which forms part of the legislative package known as the JobKeeper Scheme enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament in response to the Coronavirus pandemic. The provision, s 789GDA of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Fair Work Act), provides a minimum payment guarantee by which an employer must ensure that, if a jobkeeper payment is payable to an employer for an employee for a fortnight, the total amount payable to the employee in respect of the fortnight is the greater of the jobkeeper payment amount ($1,500 initially and then subsequently reduced) or “the amounts payable to the employee in relation...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases
  • Dahdah v Platinum Distributors Australia Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • April 22, 2022
    ...235 FCR 370 Murrihy v Betezy.com.au Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 908; 238 IR 307 Qantas Airways Ltd v Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia [2020] FCAFC 227; 282 FCR 243 Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Employment and In323(1) of the FW Act and that t......